1. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    10 Aug '07 13:401 edit
    So I played a speculative exchange sac starting with 12... Nxg3 planning to get the piece back with Rxe5+ (losing the exchange). I thought my opponent did well to get to a point where his rooks were connected and almost in the game. Had he not fallen for my cheap tricks, he should have then won. Could I have improved on my play, or was this sac flawed to begin with?


    Edit: link to game helps...
    Game 3789527
  2. Under ur ChessBoard!
    Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    2944
    10 Aug '07 13:41
    Originally posted by zebano
    So I played a speculative exchange sac starting with 12... Nxg3 planning to get the piece back with Rxe5+ (losing the exchange). I thought my opponent did well to get to a point where his rooks were connected and almost in the game. Had he not fallen for my cheap tricks, he should have then won. Could I have improved on my play, or was this sac flawed to begin with?
    huh?
  3. Standard memberwittywonka
    Chocolate Expert
    Cocoa Mountains
    Joined
    26 Nov '06
    Moves
    19249
    10 Aug '07 14:35
    Originally posted by zebano
    So I played a speculative exchange sac starting with 12... Nxg3 planning to get the piece back with Rxe5+ (losing the exchange). I thought my opponent did well to get to a point where his rooks were connected and almost in the game. Had he not fallen for my cheap tricks, he should have then won. Could I have improved on my play, or was this sac flawed to begin with?


    Edit: link to game helps...
    Game 3789527
    I think you played a very nice game, well done.
  4. Under ur ChessBoard!
    Joined
    12 Feb '07
    Moves
    2944
    10 Aug '07 15:26
    Originally posted by Restless Soul
    huh?
    ohhh...hmm I think it was unnecessary, you where a lot better before Qh4, in fact, I like f6 in that position. I like how white played Na4 later on and walked into a mating net. I would like to see the game after Rf1 instead of Na4, black is better, but white can put up some defense.
  5. Joined
    19 Feb '05
    Moves
    6190
    10 Aug '07 16:00
    Perhaps 16... d4 which results in you winning a pawn?
  6. Joined
    06 Oct '02
    Moves
    4214
    10 Aug '07 19:27
    What did you come up with as a line if you played 14... Bxc3?
    14... Bxc3 15 bxc3 Qe4+ followed by Qxh1 and f6?
  7. Joined
    16 Feb '07
    Moves
    27653
    10 Aug '07 21:31
    Originally posted by zebano
    So I played a speculative exchange sac starting with 12... Nxg3 planning to get the piece back with Rxe5+ (losing the exchange). I thought my opponent did well to get to a point where his rooks were connected and almost in the game. Had he not fallen for my cheap tricks, he should have then won. Could I have improved on my play, or was this sac flawed to begin with?


    Edit: link to game helps...
    Game 3789527
    Unless I'm missing something 11 ... f6 (as suggested by Restless Soul) wins a piece.

    12 Nf3 Nxc3+ and white is in awful shape and I don't see any tactics preventing ... fxe5 in a move or two if the knight doesn't move. Other knight moves don't help either
  8. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    10 Aug '07 22:11
    Originally posted by Erekose
    Unless I'm missing something 11 ... f6 (as suggested by Restless Soul) wins a piece.

    12 Nf3 Nxc3+ and white is in awful shape and I don't see any tactics preventing ... fxe5 in a move or two if the knight doesn't move. Other knight moves don't help either
    I think You're right. I just got so caught up in playing a "sac" for initiative that I just missed the easier win.
  9. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6500
    12 Aug '07 02:17
    14. Be2 Rxe5 Bxe5 Qxe5 0-0-0 Be6

    objectivly, probably won for black, but white has some counterplay (open files against king)
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree