Originally posted by skimsThat's the only sane reply I have Got.
Using that formula, the top players on this site (2400 RHP) would be only about 1315 ELO...
that cannot be right when you consider there are some players on here that are international players/masters.
And anyway, RHP is CORRESPONDENCE chess, whereas ELO ratings are for OTB chess.
Thanks skims
Originally posted by skimsSurely not.
Using that formula, the top players on this site (2400 RHP) would be only about 1315 ELO...
that cannot be right when you consider there are some players on here that are international players/masters.
And anyway, RHP is CORRESPONDENCE chess, whereas ELO ratings are for OTB chess.
Originally posted by skimsSorry. My bad, I got the formulas mixed up.
Using that formula, the top players on this site (2400 RHP) would be only about 1315 ELO...
that cannot be right when you consider there are some players on here that are international players/masters.
And anyway, RHP is CORRESPONDENCE chess, whereas ELO ratings are for OTB chess.
Its actually:
Multiply by 9/5, then add 32.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakThat's rubbish also.
Sorry. My bad, I got the formulas mixed up.
Its actually:
Multiply by 9/5, then add 32.
D
The top players on this site (2400 RHP) would then have ELO ratings of 4352!!
That is ridiculous...(no offence to any of the top players on this site btw)
And as I said before, RHP is for correspondence chess, whereas ELO ratings are for OTB chess.