I'm a 1.e4 player so with White Morra Gambit is excellent at club level, simple plans and very tactical.
I've found that it is easier to pick a sharp favourite line with Black. Against 1.d4 I play Benko Gambit and against 1.e4 aim for Two Knights (Traxler Counter-Attack!) or Marshall Attack in Ruy Lopez.
Originally posted by bahus I'm a 1.e4 player so with White Morra Gambit is excellent at club level, simple plans and very tactical.
I've found that it is easier to pick a sharp favourite line with Black. Against 1.d4 I play Benko Gambit and against 1.e4 aim for Two Knights (Traxler Counter-Attack!) or Marshall Attack in Ruy Lopez.
- bahus
Is this referring to the Smith-Morra Gambit Variation of the Sicilian? I'm glad you recommended this, because I need a solid response to the Sicilian and so I might give this a try. (Right now I'm using the Grand Prix Attack, but never seem to get good results with it!).
Originally posted by cmsMaster Is this referring to the Smith-Morra Gambit Variation of the Sicilian? I'm glad you recommended this, because I need a solid response to the Sicilian and so I might give this a try. (Right now I'm using the Grand Prix Attack, but never seem to get good results with it!).
The Smith Morra is a deadly weapon at the low levels, but I think once you get higher up and meet dedicated Sicilian veterans, you will get tortured. I don't think the opening is objectively any good. I am just making sure that you know that, because when I choose an opening, I always like to make sure that it's objectively good at a high level.
I've been playing Grob's attack (1 g4) of late and it's definitely resulted in some wide-open tactical games. It's surprising how many players around my level (c. 1400) have dropped a piece to Qa4+ with a double attack, or gone down a pawn early after Qxb7. I'm sure I'd get picked apart against quality opposition, but then again that would happen no matter what opening I chose. 🙂 At least this way the losses are quick and dramatic instead of slow and suffocatng....