Should Non-Paying Members have there separate Top Rankings?

Originally posted by jcmessy
[b]Should Non-Paying Members have there separate Top Ranking?
Why? and Why not?...[/b]

Don't forget, non-paying members have to put up with porn ads masquerading as weight loss ads if they don't have an adblocker.

Yes I clicked on it, yes it was an accident with a touch screen (no adblock available), and yes I am overweight (but not stupid).

Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason
Don't forget, non-paying members have to put up with porn ads masquerading as weight loss ads if they don't have an adblocker.

Yes I clicked on it, yes it was an accident with a touch screen (no adblock available), and yes I am overweight (but not stupid).

And the membership fee is astronomical, in my opinion.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I wish it was only 2! I did tons of preview-only edits only to discover that the problem was on my end.

The two edits you see were the easy part - restoring the commentary to the original form after screwing around for half an hour trying to debug the PGN viewer.

Usually, I can fix things in the pgn viewer after a while.

Other times, I just erase everything, start over from scratch, and hope it doesn't repeat. It's funny how only a [ or } can cause everything to go haywire.

My main problem is when you start from an fen instead of a whole game. Then, the notes never line up right.
I'm not pasting them. I'm putting them in one at a time, and they never come out in the right spots.
That's why I usually tend to put in a whole game and say start at move x.

I know this wasn't the case here, but there are a few bugs that need to be worked out.

It's good that the clock is ticking but unfortunate that it happened in such a slow time control. Theoretically, 8 pawn promotions could delay the game by 168 days! Also, 21 days waiting to see if an opponent will stalemate you, could be pesky too. I'm sure they'll fix it soon.