I've been looking at the Sicilian Dragon, and considering playing it. It looks like a great "defence" (in the loose sense of the word) involving sharp, tactical play.
What is the current theoretical state of this opening? I know that "refutations" are constantly being discovered which are not refutations at all when some other Dragon theorist comes up with the right counter. Which lines are sound? Which aren't?
I'm also looking for somewhere on the web where I can find some annotated Dragon games for free (I've already played through the five on the Exeter Chess Club website).
Also, what do you all think of the Dragon?
Thanks in advance.
Luke.
Originally posted by lukemcmullanWhats a sicilian dragon?
I've been looking at the Sicilian Dragon, and considering playing it. It looks like a great "defence" (in the loose sense of the word) involving sharp, tactical play.
What is the current theoretical state of this opening? I know that "refutations" are constantly being discovered which are not refutations at all when some other Dragon theorist ...[text shortened]...
Also, what do you all think of the Dragon?
Thanks in advance.
Luke.
Originally posted by lukemcmullanA romantic opening with lots of sacrifices, traps, tricks and blissful combinations. I love it! But, I don't play it any longer, because the fianchetto on the king side is weak when White castles Queen side! LOL
I've been looking at the Sicilian Dragon, and considering playing it. It looks like a great "defence" (in the loose sense of the word) involving sharp, tactical play.
What is the current theoretical state of this opening? I know that "refutations" are constantly being discovered which are not refutations at all when some other Dragon theorist ...[text shortened]...
Also, what do you all think of the Dragon?
Thanks in advance.
Luke.
Originally posted by lukemcmullanBut, if White castles Queen side, Black's fian-debto on the black squares is weak, that is unless you're a strong player and can play the theoretical lines well, and aren't afraid of making a wild Tal sacrifice. Let's face it. Dragon is romantic and strong in Pillsbury's day. Today, it's weak. Even Fischer said so!
A fianchetto (pronounced fian-keyyetto, it's Italian) is where you put a bishop on b2, g2, b7 or g7 to make use of the long diagonal.
Originally posted by powershakerFischer said a lot of things. What he meant when he was talking about the Dragon is that it's probably not the best to play regularly at the very top. I agree. However, at any level other than that (or at GM level as an occasional surprise) the Dragon is a perfectly acceptable opening choice.
But, if White castles Queen side, Black's fian-debto on the black squares is weak, that is unless you're a strong player and can play the theoretical lines well, and aren't afraid of making a wild Tal sacrifice. Let's face it. Dragon is romantic and strong in Pillsbury's day. Today, it's weak. Even Fischer said so!
Originally posted by powershakerThe Dragon ,as any other opening,is not weak if played correctly.
But, if White castles Queen side, Black's fian-debto on the black squares is weak, that is unless you're a strong player and can play the theoretical lines well, and aren't afraid of making a wild Tal sacrifice. Let's face it. Dragon is romantic and strong in Pillsbury's day. Today, it's weak. Even Fischer said so!
It becomes weak if you play the wrong moves.