Go back
Skeeter back at 2400.

Skeeter back at 2400.

Only Chess

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kopatov
.......... skeeter is still back on the "menu"..........
... whilst you're just "back"...

skeets

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hi Skeets.

No game of Monopoly this time.

This time it's Cludi...sorry...Cluedo 🙂

Colonel Mustard & Professor Plum are annoying Miss Scarlet in the Kitchen.

The very Reverend Green(pawn) watches with disbelief.

"What has this to do with chess?" he mutters.

Take this game to the General Forum boys.....If you dare.
There are those there that will suck you in and blow you out bubbles.
This kind of tripe does not belong on the Chess forum.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm gone. I'll leave you to the bankrupt wife beater and of course, Cludi. Sorry, typo, I meant Cluedo.

skeeter

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
I'm gone. I'll leave you to the bankrupt wife beater and of course, Cludi. Sorry, typo, I meant Cluedo.

skeeter
Skeeter rhymes with Cheater.

Coincidence?

/Thread

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

...and USApooper rhymes with shirt-lifter.

Coincidence?

/Thread

skeets

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
...and USApooper rhymes with shirt-lifter.

Coincidence?

/Thread

skeets
Actually that doesn't rhyme at all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

By the way I was just having fun with you, Skeeter.

I have no idea whether or not you're cheating, and I certainly don't make accusations without ample cause.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Too late.

Paratrooper rhymes with 'bloober' and you just made one. 😉

A skeeter is a nik for a mosquito and we all know it is the female of species
that does all the biting.
You are only going to end up getting stung.

Vote Up
Vote Down

What I'd like to know is why skeeters thread with me in the title was left in the Clan forum for nearly three days and only vanished when I asked if one set of rules applied to "a skeeter", while the others applied to the rest of us.

It's okay for "a skeeter" to make false accusations and blatant lies isn't it Green Pawn and rest of the apologists?

Skeeter, skeeter, pumpkin eater.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Hi Skeets.

No game of Monopoly this time.

This time it's Cludi...sorry...[b]Cluedo
🙂

Colonel Mustard & Professor Plum are annoying Miss Scarlet in the Kitchen.

The very Reverend Green(pawn) watches with disbelief.

"What has this to do with chess?" he mutters.

Take this game to the General Forum boys.....If you dare.
There are th ...[text shortened]... suck you in and blow you out bubbles.
This kind of tripe does not belong on the Chess forum.[/b]
At least i mentioned a chess term, 'fork' !

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

It's OK now kopatov. Most know who you really are, and certainly those who drop into Tram Crash to read all about it, and those who have PM'd me certainly know now about your past deeds here.

I have absolutely no tolerance for the Casey Jones on this site and even less for those who return under another nik.

skeeter

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kopatov
What I'd like to know is why skeeters thread with me......
You are a reasonable chess player.

There is more to the chess forum you can contribute than this attack on a woman.
(and the system in general.)

She only came on here to defend herself. I've no idea about the Clan forum,
I never go there. I cannot recall ever posting there.

Take it to the GF if you have a problem with her SEX.

Complain to the admin if you think you are being treated unfairly.

Rasie an FTP if you think she is dodgy.

You know how it works, you have been here before.

(I don't know how the MODS will look upon an FTP tainted with a personal grievance.)

5 edits

Originally posted by greenpawn34
You are a reasonable chess player.

There is more to the chess forum you can contribute than this attack on a woman.
(and the system in general.)

She only came on here to defend herself. I've no idea about the Clan forum,
I never go there. I cannot recall ever posting there.

Take it to the GF if you have a problem with her SEX.

Complain ...[text shortened]... fore.

(I don't know how the MODS will look upon an FTP tainted with a personal grievance.)
what is skeety doing in chess only then? far as i can tell, not one of her posts contains
any chess related material, nor has he/she evah evah evah evah evah posted any chess
related material in the chess forum, or anywhere else for that matter, Kopatov is
correct, its double standards to insist that he take his case to the bubble blowers in
general while skeety is guilty of the very same thing, regardless of her motivations for
doing so.

let me ask you would you resign this position, as white? i did.




position after 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nb1c3 Ng8f6 4. Bc1g5 Bf8b4 5. e5 h6 6. Bg5d2
Bb4xc3 7. Bd2xc3 Nf6e4 8. Bc3b4 c5 9. dxc5 Ne4xf2 10. Ke1xf2 Qd8h4


My opponent was a little surprised that i resigned it, however what do i have to look
forward to? a shattered queen side, castling by hand, further loss of development,
an isolated e pawn, further loss of material, against a player rated 300 points above
me, no thanks! I choose life.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what is skeety doing in chess only then?
Perhaps responding to posts 2&3 in this thread ? And it rolls downhill from there ? I don't read every thread but what I see here is returning fire.

6 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by thaughbaer
Perhaps responding to posts 2&3 in this thread ? And it rolls downhill from there ? I don't read every thread but what I see here is returning fire.
you think, when neither was specifically addressed to them directly, well ok, thats fine,
she/he is simply trolling, but they should still put some chess content into their posts
along side the caustic diatribe, just to keep it legit!

Here is a position from a Karpov game, what do you think the best move is and why?




Karpov writes: 22. g4!! such moves afford me the greatest satisfaction. white succeeds into seeing into the future. In the immediate future the game will transpose into a double rook ending with light squared bishops. The black bishops mobility is restricted by its own pawn on d5 and now my pawn on g4 will also cramp it. It may be objected: you are placing a pawn on a square of the same colour of your own bishop! This is indeed so, but my bishop is operating on different diagonals

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.