01 Sep '11 05:41>
Now she gets even less point for a win, so it gets a lot more difficult to stay at 2400. Good job anyway Skeets.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't know. Maybe if she joined improveyourchess.com she could get to the realms of 2600+
yeah it must be tough for our resident IM's and GM's.
Originally posted by adramforalldo i sense sarcasm here?
I don't know. Maybe if she joined improveyourchess.com she could get to the realms of 2600+
That site has helped several players on here get from 1400/1600 to 2,000+ and one of them even hit 2385, though he is now retired from the site.
If lowly rated players can improve by so much imagine what it would do to the ability of someone who understands chess!
Originally posted by adramforallIf I was a chick with a rating of 2400 i would enter tournaments and become a
I don't know. Maybe if she joined improveyourchess.com she could get to the realms of 2600+
That site has helped several players on here get from 1400/1600 to 2,000+ and one of them even hit 2385, though he is now retired from the site.
If lowly rated players can improve by so much imagine what it would do to the ability of someone who understands chess!
Originally posted by skeeterand why not i was simply wondering? please see the comment above and farming is
To date, there are no IM or GM's currently playing on this site. So, go back to your farm yard RC - probably more comfortable there for you as you suck at chess.
skeeter
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe problem with you RC, is that you think a rating on this site is somehow related to an FIDE rating. Big fail so go back to the farm yard and practise your horsey moves.
If I was a chick with a rating of 2400 i would enter tournaments and become a
registered Gm, pose in glamour magazines and endorse fashion trends. In fact I would
be a kick in the bum away from the former world champions rating of a mere 2469
and coming in at number 67 in the world.
http://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=women
Originally posted by skeetersigh, its not a problem with me skeety as you erroneously claim despite your nefarious
The problem with you RC, is that you think a rating on this site is somehow related to an FIDE rating. Big fail so go back to the farm yard and practise your horsey moves.
skeeter
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRC, you really have absolutely no idea what your talking about here. First, this is not a CC site, it is a turn-based internet chess site, server based with no client software required. Second, any comparison with members whom I've never played, is erroneous and therefore they could hardly be called 'my peers'.
sigh, its not a problem with me skeety as you erroneously claim despite your nefarious
machinations to make it personal (how predictable and such a crashing bore), for a
correspondence rating of 2400 is a correspondence rating of 2400 and is gauged in
relation to your win/loss ratio with respect to your peers, who as we are well aware,
contai ...[text shortened]... t, I may just do that, although the temptation to
hang out some more with you is irresistible.
Originally posted by skeeterAlthough your arguments are not a little tenuous being based upon technicalities ill let it
RC, you really have absolutely no idea what your talking about here. First, this is not a CC site, it is a turn-based internet chess site, server based with no client software required. Second, any comparison with members whom I've never played, is erroneous and therefore they could hardly be called 'my peers'.
I've never claimed to be the best player on e, that's all I have to say about this to you and to your barn yard mates.
skeeter
Originally posted by skeeterWas that really called for?
To date, there are no IM or GM's currently playing on this site. So, go back to your farm yard RC - probably more comfortable there for you as you suck at chess.
skeeter