09 Dec '11 10:24>
Originally posted by fgchI think this is ok for older kids that already play chess and need to practice. But I think the method is a bit scholastic for younger kids that want to explore and have fun.
http://www.chesskids.com/ckapg.pdf
Saying things like:
"Did you see I am threatening your queen? What should your next move be?"
or "Oh, you are about to capture ... I should defend it."
puts stress on the kid for every move it will play, because you're guiding him to play on your strength.
Fun should be the goal, I think. When I was young, I liked playing 'four-on-a-row'. Now, I hate it, because it is too complex and I'm only focussing on the result. Chess has the same pitfall.
The idea of unbalanced teams is nice, at least if the kid can grasp the complexity of the initial position. Otherwise, starting with only just a few number of pieces is better. In fact, that's what we call the 'endgame'. Converting a 'won position' into a 'win' is already a big achievement for kids in my opinion.