Go back
the joy of knight mating

the joy of knight mating

Only Chess

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ironstalemate
you to ruin this thread
I'm afraid you ruined your own thread when you accused that poor
lad of plagiarism because you did not know who the Pride and
Sorrow of Chess was. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Here's a good one.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Just salvaged a game with this sac -> knight mate:

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tamuzi
Just salvaged a game with this sac -> knight mate:

[pgn][Event "Open invite"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2009.05.12"]
[EndDate "2009.05.18"]
[Round "?"]
[White "tamuzi"]
[Black "troska"]
[WhiteRating "1290"]
[BlackRating "1209"]
[WhiteELO "1290"]
[BlackELO "1209"]
[Result "1-0"]
[GameId "6312702"]

1. e4 a5 2. d4 a4 3. Bf1c4 e6 ...[text shortened]... 14. Nc3xd5 Nb8c6 15. Rf1e1 Ng8e7 16. Nd5xb6 cxb6 17. Nh5f6 1-0
[/pgn]
Why not Ndf6# immediately?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'll go through and tell ya, but most likely its that I didn't see it.

Yep, didn't see it. Stupid visualization, not realizing the bishop lane could clear and check be created in 1 move.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
Well, just because there are possible last moves other than ...f5 doesn't make ep invalid it is invalid as a rule.... I think. That would make sense at least since black could have played ...f5. Anyway its all semantics and that isn't the point of the problem. The OP insisted a post a knight mate so I did (flawed but still a knight mate)
EP is valid in a chess problem if you can PROVE that the previous move was a two-square pawn advance.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

greenpawn , dont talk to me anymore

you are just a troll

sorry that i didnt base this thread on giving glory to greenpawn...

thats right , you didnt have to say it

Vote Up
Vote Down

ATTN: Flamers not welcome in these fora.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
EP is valid in a chess problem if you can PROVE that the previous move was a two-square pawn advance.
"in a chess problem" that was the point I was trying to make I probably could have worded it better. Anyway, thanks for clearing that up.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tomtom232
ATTN: Flamers not welcome in these fora.
then why are you still here?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ironstalemate
So lets have a thread about knight mates 🙂


[pgn]1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.dxe5 Qe7 5.Qe2 Nc5 6.Bg5 Qe6 7.Nd4 Qb6 8.Qf3 Qxb2 9.Bc4 Ne6

10.Nxe6 dxe6 11.Qd3 Nd7 12.Nc3 Qxa1 13.Ke2 Qxh1 14.Nb5 Qxg2 15.Nxc7
[/pgn]
14... Qe1+ 15.kxe1 Bb4+ 16.c3 Ba5

now its interesting

Vote Up
Vote Down

"Sometimes, [flamers]* attempt to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority over other users. Other times, a [flamer]* is simply an individual who believes he or she carries the only valid opinion"

Wikipedia


* replace contents of [] with ironstalemate

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

little kid im done with you for now

dont embarress yourself

looks like the mods are just going to let trolls run loose

so im leaving and wont be back

have fun growing up guys

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ironstalemate
little kid im done with you for now

dont embarress yourself

looks like the mods are just going to let trolls run loose

so im leaving and wont be back

have fun growing up guys
Hallelujah! Praise Jesus!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

*cough*troll*cough* oh wait, he's gone! Hurray!