I've heard it a number of times and I definitely agree. Even in the 2000+ level I see pawn pins totally ignored. A nicely placed bishop (especially after castling) can dominate an opposing king.
Originally posted by ih8sens I've heard it a number of times and I definitely agree. Even in the 2000+ level I see pawn pins totally ignored. A nicely placed bishop (especially after castling) can dominate an opposing king.
so, on a scale of one to ten, what was your reaction when you saw my move?
one being completely expectant
ten being lost/bewildered/confused/dumbfounded/...
Originally posted by rubberjaw30 so, on a scale of one to ten, what was your reaction when you saw my move?
one being completely expectant
ten being lost/bewildered/confused/dumbfounded/...
when i saw Qc7 I kinda figured.. you're only other move (which won for me anyways) was back to Qd8.
I think I am especially susceptable to those pins, not only did I miss a perpetual against you that time, but I have also lost games when I didnt notice the pin.
Game 3967889 This being the most recent example that springs to mind.
Originally posted by ih8sens I've heard it a number of times and I definitely agree. Even in the 2000+ level I see pawn pins totally ignored. A nicely placed bishop (especially after castling) can dominate an opposing king.
I've also played one where I salvaged a draw from a totally lost position because of my opponent (2000) missing the pawn pin... I should look it up.
I find the rook lift to be overlooked not as often but only because it isn't a possibilty as much as the absolute pawn pin. I have a game somwhere where a player considerably higher rated than me offered a draw overlooking a dangerous rook lift that lead to the win for me.