20 Aug '09 21:40>3 edits
Originally posted by OhforfI think you have missed the answer in the above posts, it was there:
As I said, I agree with all that. What I was asking was something different: why would anyone ~want~ to stop a game for a timeout after only a few moves if the game is about even, only a couple of hours after the skull appears?
time is a part of the equation and claiming the win in the 5th move is no different than mating your opponent in the 5th move if s/he gives you the opportunity.
would you just ~want~ to keep playing instead of 5.Qxf7# ?
I think you have missed the answer in the above posts, it was there:
time is a part of the equation and claiming the win in the 5th move is no different than mating your opponent in the 5th move if s/he gives you the opportunity.
would you just ~want~ to keep playing instead of 5.Qxf7# ?
edit:
oh well, I've just finished your post and you've said "In fact, whenever anyone makes an obvious blunder that is reversible I always offer them the opportunity to take the move back, since I prefer an interesting game to a stupid win. "
now I understand why you don't understand, but I don't understand why you play chess in the first place if you won't take advantage of blunders. the game is all about not making blunders yourself and taking advantage of you opponent's.