Originally posted by SwissGambit
[b]Because his blunder was a pawn move, which is impossible to take back in an online game, duh.
A pitiful attempt to hide behind a technicality. So what if the pawn cannot be moved back to a4? Fact remains that the position after ...Qa7 is more interesting than the one after ...QxN. ...QxN shows that, in practice, you DO value the result over kee e position after ...Qa7 in the first example is more interesting than the one after ...QxN?[/b]
As accurate as this analysis is, (or at least as accurate as Behaviorism
can be) I fail to see Swiss, how you intend on connecting this to actual
mentality. I think while you've done well to provide a counter-weight
to his laisze faire attitude towards time controls, I fail to see how you'll
provide anything lasting against such an apathetic approach.
Idealistic rationalism, as your approach is nearly such, provides a
keen look on the ridculousness of his personal habits. It doesn't
seem to provide any type of lasting effect because it doesn't make
any underlying connection to his personality. Other than of course, his
supposed grace towards his opponents. Which you've thuroughly
disproven.
That said, I enjoyed your posts the very most in this thread.
+1 Rec
-GIN