1. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8260
    17 Jan '14 23:06
    Originally posted by byedidia
    Second greatest waste? What's first?
    Spirituality Forums.
  2. Standard memberbyedidia
    Mister Why
    San Carlos, CA
    Joined
    21 Feb '12
    Moves
    6039
    18 Jan '14 00:11
    Originally posted by moonbus
    Spirituality Forums.
    Ah.
  3. Joined
    10 Jan '08
    Moves
    16950
    18 Jan '14 00:39
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I'd say the problem is the difference between the average person and people who play in tournaments.

    To the average person you play to win. A loss or a tie mean the same thing. You did not win. If you play for a tie you play to lose.
    Especially for an American as they don;t have ties 😉

    Although I do believe the OP is from the UK, haven't checked yet.
  4. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    31549
    18 Jan '14 01:11
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I'd say the problem is the difference between the average person and people who play in tournaments.

    To the average person you play to win. A loss or a tie mean the same thing. You did not win. If you play for a tie you play to lose.
    yup, thats exactly my line of thinking. i grew up playing baseball as a kid/teen and if it was the last inning, down by 2, we weren't thinking lets get 2 runs to tie, we were thinking lets get 3 to win. but i understand the chess tournament line of thinking. obviously in that scoring system and draw means something. in normal games, yeah i guess a draw makes you lose less overall points then losing outright, so if you really care about that score then i can see a draw as being something worth playing for.

    anyways i'd like to thank those of you who added to this convo and/or gave advice without jumping on me like a lion on a fresh kill. for you, i just offered a draw to my opponent...but i still don't like it hahaha.

    also, to an outsider of the chess culture/RHP forum culture, you guys do seem pretty hardcore, whether you realize it, or want to admit it. i didn't think my initial question would raise such a backlash, though i do lurk on metal forums from time to time, so i guess it was to be expected.
  5. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    31549
    18 Jan '14 01:13
    Originally posted by Trev33
    Especially for an American as they don;t have ties 😉

    Although I do believe the OP is from the UK, haven't checked yet.
    did you just call me american? i'll take being called a Brit any day of the week though, especially since Canadians are tied to the UK.
  6. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    31549
    18 Jan '14 01:20
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Flaw in your tactical play mate. There is a wee trick you are missing.
    As pointed out, earlier in this game here

    [fen] 8/R3bkp1/5pqp/1p2p3/2p1Q3/P5P1/1P3P2/6K1 [/fen]
    You had a choice of three good moves. (all with a check...Check ALL Checks).
    White played 31.Qb7?

    31.Rxe7+ leaves White a whole Queen up.
    31.Qxg6+ and after Rxe7 White is a Rook ...[text shortened]... d]


    i can't believe i missed ALL those...maybe i should just delete my account hahaha wow...
  7. Standard memberChessPraxis
    Cowboy From Hell
    American West
    Joined
    19 Apr '10
    Moves
    55013
    18 Jan '14 01:26
    Dude, everyone misses stuff.
  8. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    18 Jan '14 01:51
    Originally posted by fatherdeath
    yup, thats exactly my line of thinking. i grew up playing baseball as a kid/teen and if it was the last inning, down by 2, we weren't thinking lets get 2 runs to tie, we were thinking lets get 3 to win. but i understand the chess tournament line of thinking. obviously in that scoring system and draw means something. in normal games, yeah i guess a draw m ...[text shortened]... backlash, though i do lurk on metal forums from time to time, so i guess it was to be expected.
    I did you more good than any of the 'polite' responses. This is what happens when you combine ignorance with arrogance - you end up looking the fool.

    Oh, and you're still in one piece, BTW. You're welcome.
  9. Joined
    10 Jan '08
    Moves
    16950
    18 Jan '14 02:03
    Originally posted by fatherdeath
    did you just call me american? i'll take being called a Brit any day of the week though, especially since Canadians are tied to the UK.
    Close enough, Canada is little America.
  10. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    227331
    18 Jan '14 02:39
    Originally posted by fatherdeath
    why not resign if you won't try to win? you spend the entire game trying to win, then the second you have 1 less piece then your opponent you go for a draw?? thats more cowardly then anything else to me.
    Especially in Corr. Chess.
    Maybe in blitz keep going.
    When people don't resign just wait till the last possible minute to make each move in Corr. Chess.
  11. Joined
    12 Nov '06
    Moves
    74414
    18 Jan '14 07:068 edits
    Originally posted by fatherdeath
    i just offered a draw to my opponent...but i still don't like it hahaha.
    I hate to break it to ya, but you just offered a draw in a winning position. It was only a draw if your opponent kept putting you in check, as there is no way to escape those checks.

    Your opponent played Kh5, you were in the clear, you were winning now. The move you played (Rd7) was an excellent move as it prevented your opponent from the perpetual check idea.

    Here's how the game might have finished

  12. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8260
    18 Jan '14 09:061 edit
    Originally posted by fatherdeath
    anyways i'd like to thank those of you who added to this convo and/or gave advice without jumping on me like a lion on a fresh kill.

    to an outsider of the chess culture/RHP forum culture, you guys do seem pretty hardcore, whether you realize it, or want to admit it. i didn't think my initial question would raise such a backlash.
    Chess players love to kibitz; it's part of the chess-playing mind-set to analyze other's games and comment on them. No offense intended.

    Edit: some contributors to these forums drift towards polemic sometimes. You find out who they are when you read three or four threads. Some of them are fairly strong players, so take their advice, if you find it sound, and disregard their cant.
  13. Joined
    29 Oct '09
    Moves
    1421
    18 Jan '14 13:13
    Originally posted by KnightStalker47
    I hate to break it to ya, but you just offered a draw in a winning position. It was only a draw if your opponent kept putting you in check, as there is no way to escape those checks.

    Your opponent played Kh5, you were in the clear, you were winning now. The move you played (Rd7) was an excellent move as it prevented your opponent from the perpetu ...[text shortened]... or Qe3 is met with Rg1 winning the queen and Kh2 with Rd2} 7. Rg1 Qh3 8. Qh6 {Checkmate} [/pgn]
    And that's why games in progress should not be commented on.
  14. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    31549
    18 Jan '14 17:00
    thanks Knight, i realize the perpetual draw was broken, but he was trying for a draw for a good 15 turns in a row and since he eventually gave up, i just gave him the draw he so badly wanted in the first place.
  15. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    31549
    18 Jan '14 17:02
    I also wanted to say i just won a game (via checkmate) solely on the advice given of "check all checks"...so everything is right in the world now.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree