20 Jan '06 20:37>
Originally posted by RahimKDone! π
Ravello help!
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=36949&page=5
I think this person need some words of wisdom from you.
Originally posted by powershakeryou may or may not have your current games against 1500's, I don't care enough to waste my time checking your individual games. I just checked your profile, and the facts are: you've got 58 won games, 33 lost. that means your average opponent is about 150pts lower than you. your last game was against a 700.
Actually, out of all 20 games I'm playing right now, I'm playing 1400 and 1500 players, so you don't have a clue what you're talking about wormwood. Use the facts before you speak. Nearly all my games are 1400s and 1500s players. π
Originally posted by wormwoodNo, actually, if you should know, that 700 player started out as a 1700+ player! And, it's not my fault if - while I'm playing an opponent like Grandmouster - if his rating drops from 1720 to 1615 or lower. Needless to say, I've been attempting all along to play 1500+ players, because how do you think the games I am playing are all clan games, only matching me up with the rating range I am presently holding? So, you stuck your foot in your mouth. Now, that's funny! I suggest people who are not 1500 stop blowing their rating up falsely so that while I'm playing them, they lose 200 points in the process and I get a win and only 4 points added to my rating.
you may or may not have your current games against 1500's, I don't care enough to waste my time checking your individual games. I just checked your profile, [b]and the facts are: you've got 58 won games, 33 lost. that means your average opponent is about 150pts lower than you. your last game was against a 700.
if you played people the same rating you ...[text shortened]... ere, you'd have as many wins as you have losses. that's the way the rating-algorithm works.[/b]
Originally posted by powershakerπ΄π΄
And, this is his rating now: Llewellyn (960)
powershaker (1532)
And, here's the game if you want to review it: Game 1615427
Originally posted by RavelloIf I'm boring, don't read my posts, Ravello! That might work for you, I think, right? But, I know I own you. I know you have to respond when I type, because if truth be known, you love to post after my posts. You think it makes you famous. LOL
π΄π΄
You already posted about this game in four different threads now,you start to become boring more than annoying.......
Originally posted by powershakerI just read the threads where there are new posts and until I have read them I can't know their content ,don't you think?
If I'm boring, don't read my posts, Ravello! That might work for you, I think, right? But, I know I own you. I know you have to respond when I type, because if truth be known, you love to post after my posts. You think it makes you famous. LOL
Originally posted by RavelloOkay, I'll start posting other stuff to entertain you, Ravello. Okay? Don't get too tear-eyed. Witness the new thread that's out?
I just read the threads where there are new posts and until I have read them I can't know their content ,don't you think?
Everytime I wish in vain that you have posted something new or something interesting about chess,but you still go on beating that dead horse about rating.....
Originally posted by RavelloAnd he was not winning this game at any point after 23...Rxd1.
π΄π΄
You already posted about this game in four different threads now,you start to become boring more than annoying.......
Originally posted by powershakerno feet in my mouth, I just called it like the numbers show. - but you do have a point about mass resignations, I'll give you that. though I also believe those people probably had a good reason. nobody would lose 1000pts just for fun. still, the mass resignation doesn't apply to grandhomophobic. he's just as much a 1700 as I'm a 1600 for peaking shortly at 1608.
No, actually, if you should know, that 700 player started out as a 1700+ player! ...
Originally posted by GrandmousterI suck at blitz. I mean REALLY Suck at blitz. I couldn't blitz my way out of a paper bag. I'm 1000 at FICS for the blitz, and 1380 for the standard rating. but CC isn't blitz.
If your making assumtions about my rating, be prepared to back it up with an action. We can play a few blitz games, at say yahoo, or ICC, or any free chess server.
Then, if im just 1600 as you say, i should win about 60% of my games.
If im 1800+ as my current blitz rating is, then i should win 80-90% (or 100π΅ of my games.
But if your to hung up on ratings, as is your good friend, powerless, or something, then dont bother..π
Originally posted by wormwoodYes, you poor thing, you have infeiriority complexes, and a lack of self esteem, which translates in a nebulous "authority" of ratings, and players ability.
I suck at blitz. I mean REALLY Suck at blitz. I couldn't blitz my way out of a paper bag. I'm 1000 at FICS for the blitz, and 1380 for the standard rating. but CC isn't blitz.
again, I'm only looking at your graph here. if you're better than 1600, your rating will surely rise to reflect that. now it doesn't look like you'd be a 1800. in CC.
Originally posted by GrandmousterIt seems like there are some players here who are obsessed with their rating.
Yes, you poor thing, you have infeiriority complexes, and a lack of self esteem, which translates in a nebulous "authority" of ratings, and players ability.
If you where, say, 2400. i might sulk, and lower my head, and do a "aww, shucks"...
:'(
But seeing as you are a true patzer, with your 1000 blitz rating, i can only laugh.π΅
I will get to 1800, ...[text shortened]... ir cheap shots at my supposed abilitys, i will laugh π, and continue on my way to mastery