Originally posted by rubberjaw30 no one plays it OTB anymore because it leads to such cramping positions...
Philidor was at a crack-induced time in his life when he was promoting 2. ... d6
the f8 bishop becomes weak, and d5 too...
I've played it OTB with some success, true its a little cramped but it gives white few targets. On a different note, the whole point of modern openings (King's Indian, Alekhine etc) is to start out with said cramp position and attack the fortified position of white.
Originally posted by c guy1 I've played it OTB with some success, true its a little cramped but it gives white few targets. On a different note, the whole point of modern openings (King's Indian, Alekhine etc) is to start out with said cramp position and attack the fortified position of white.
which is why I don't play Alekhine's or the King's Indian...
but i don't do so well in completely open positions either...
I like the semi-opens from the Slav and Caro-Kann...
yes, white does get few targets, but the already weak f7 square is one of those targets...
White has given up a Knight for two pawns and potential for the kingside attack
Muzio Gambit
1. e4
1... e5
2. f4
2...exf4
3. Nf3
3...g5
4. Bc4
4...g4
5. O-O!?
5...gxf3
6. Qxf3
...[text shortened]... he f-file. You can also sac the Bishop on f7 a few moves later and things get very interesting.
never heard of the Cochrane, but it looks fun enough...
Muzio is known from the king's gambit...
even more fun...
Originally posted by DeepThought The first two of these are from Benonis, and I'm not sure that they count as attacks on f7 - more sort smashing through the centre, although f7 played it's part in both. My opponent in the last one is a total beginner and well...