Go back
well the best engine wins:

well the best engine wins:

Only Chess

3 edits
Vote Up
5
Vote Down

cenerantola now at 2500. How many times has anyone (human or otherwise) reached that score?

Could this be Ironman31 reincarnated?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
cenerantola now at 2500. How many times has anyone (human or otherwise) reached that score?

Could this be Ironman31 reincarnated?
must have been the 7 year break he took, must have been training somewhere

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by roma45
must have been the 7 year break he took, must have been training somewhere
The most important stat is the opponent average rating. And thats 900 points below his rating.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steve45
The most important stat is the opponent average rating. And thats 900 points below his rating.
That stat is not too important. That just means that the vast majority of his games he gets zero rating points. At 2500, he gets 1 point for beating a 2100 rated player😲

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightStalker47
That stat is not too important. That just means that the vast majority of his games he gets zero rating points. At 2500, he gets 1 point for beating a 2100 rated player😲
I think you get 1 point no matter what. My rating tends to creep up a bit when I get a bunch of lower-rated challenges, or I get a bunch of welcome games with new people.

I usually end up giving them back in due time as I regress back to the mean.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Paul Leggett
I think you get 1 point no matter what. My rating tends to creep up a bit when I get a bunch of lower-rated challenges, or I get a bunch of welcome games with new people.

I usually end up giving them back in due time as I regress back to the mean.
For >2200 rated players if the difference in rating is more than 714 the higher rated player gets a big fat zero.

I'm surprised you think you get 1 point no matter what. There are many times you got zero points on your own graph!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
cenerantola now at 2500. How many times has anyone (human or otherwise) reached that score?

Could this be Ironman31 reincarnated?
Not too sure, but shouldn't his profile read
gutta cavat lapidem
?????

Or
Via con siliconis?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightStalker47
That stat is not too important. That just means that the vast majority of his games he gets zero rating points. At 2500, he gets 1 point for beating a 2100 rated player😲
A stat I find significant is the 410 moves in 7 days (average is 58.5 moves a day!). Amazing stamina even against lower opposition, although you can mix a couple 2000+ opposition in there too.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by King Tiger
A stat I find significant is the 410 moves in 7 days (average is 58.5 moves a day!). Amazing stamina even against lower opposition, although you can mix a couple 2000+ opposition in there too.
65 games in progress puts the 58.5 moves a day in context

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ketchuplover
65 games in progress puts the 58.5 moves a day in context
58.5 moves a day and maintaining his/her strength of play is not possible for a human player. It takes time to find good moves.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by King Tiger
58.5 moves a day and maintaining his/her strength of play is not possible for a human player. It takes time to find good moves.
Duh!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ketchuplover
65 games in progress puts the 58.5 moves a day in context
No it doesn't. The guy is making nearly 60 high quality moves (GM hard thinking niveau) a day. He should take up professional chess and make loads of money ...

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightStalker47
For >2200 rated players if the difference in rating is more than 714 the higher rated player gets a big fat zero.

I'm surprised you think you get 1 point no matter what. There are many times you got zero points on your own graph!
I don't ever remember playing a game where my rating did not go up at all for a win, unless the game was unrated. I'll have to check. I tend not to look at the ratings here too much, so I probably just didn't notice.

The old USCF rating system was ELO-based like this one, and it used to award 1 point for a win no matter how big the discrepancy,and I did not realize this system was different. Theu current USCF system now uses "win expectancy against score group" and does not lend itself to an easy rule-of-thumb calculation.

Thanks for the "heads up".