Go back
What to do against 1. Nf3 and 1. c4?

What to do against 1. Nf3 and 1. c4?

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have found turning the positions into a slav type game has worked fairly well for me - white inevitably has to play d4 and if he is really stubborn and wont transpose into a d4 system then black should try and stake a hold in the centre to teach him a lesson.

So my usual replies are something like this.

Against 1.Nf3 d5 (and c6 soon after)
Against 1.c4 c6 (with d5 played as early as possible.)

Although, having said this, over the board I have quite a liking for 1.c4 c5 as black to keep whites activity to a minimum.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks everyone, it seems like you have good solutions. However, what about the Nimzo/QID (with Ba6) player? It seems like the only real choice is the Nimzo-English. What are your thoughts on this?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
Against the dutch, I will play c4, Nc3, d3 aiming to play e4 which is more or less impossible to do once you have committed to d4.
User 340422 is the Dutch!

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by exigentsky
Being a Nimzo Indian/Queen's Indian and Sicilian player, I have many choices against 1. c4 and 1. Nf3. However, I am still not sure what to do because I don't just want to play what easily fits with my repertoire. I want to try to play the best moves. This is why I refuse to play Nf6 against 1. c4. Nf6 tells my opponent that I consider his move equal to 1 pe you will help me. What should I do against 1. c4 and 1. Nf3? What do you do and why?
To be honest I had the same problem for a while.
I'm primarily a Nimzo-Indian/QGA player and the moves 1.Nf3 and 1.c4 are a bit of a spanner in the works.

Options v 1.c4 are indeed 1...e5 or 1...c5 giving a pure English Opening. I tried both of these options and was never fully satisfied with the positions I got, (although if you are a Sicilian player you will probably prefer 1...c5 to 1...e5).

If you want to play 1...e5 v 1.c4 then why bother playing 1...c5 v 1.Nf3 where you are just learning two openings after 2.c4

Contrary to popular belief 1.c4 c5 and 1.c4 e5 are about as theoretcal as a 1.d4 or 1.e4 defence.

With this in mind I prefered to learn another 1.d4 defence!

Against 1.c4 I now play 1...e6 followed by 2...d5
Against 1.Nf3 I now play 1...d5

Also I can play 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 enetring a QGD again.

So by learning the QGD I can still play the lovely NID but only then need to learn one defence against 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 and 1.c4 and 1.Nf3!!

This is certainly my method when playing OTB, but of course you must find a way of playing the QG that suits your style.

(Personally I think everyone should have a good grounding in the QG as it is such a historical opening which teaches you a lot about chess as a whole, as does the Ruy Lopez!!!!!!)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
User 340422 is the Dutch!
You're not even Dutch yourself. Go away 😉
I might call myself the 'Scheveningen Variation' if I lived in Scheveningen, but unfortunately that's at least 10 minutes away...

Vote Up
Vote Down

In the end, I think I will play e5 vs c4 and the Nimzo-English if Nf3.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
...That said, I don't think any of us below 2000 are doing much good for ourselves wasting so much time on opening study.
I agree. Tactics should be the bulk of study.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
I have found turning the positions into a slav type game has worked fairly well for me...
That's what I do. I try to get a Slav going vs. 1.c4, 1.Nf3, and 1.d4. It works for all three openings, so I only have to "know" two defenses as Black.

Edit: vs. 1.e4 I play Ze French (1...e6)

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
I have found turning the positions into a slav type game has worked fairly well for me - white inevitably has to play d4 and if he is really stubborn and wont transpose into a d4 system then black should try and stake a hold in the centre to teach him a lesson.

So my usual replies are something like this.

Against 1.Nf3 d5 (and c6 soon after) ...[text shortened]... over the board I have quite a liking for 1.c4 c5 as black to keep whites activity to a minimum.
Black can play ...c6 and ...d5 against any opening! If you know the Slav and the Caro-Kann, then most of your games with Black will at least have similar pawn structures. In his "Black Defensive System for the Rest of Your Chess Career", GM Andrew Soltis recommends the Slav and Caro-Kann.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by magnublm
I agree. Tactics should be the bulk of study.
openings help, since they can reduce games to familiar territory on a regular basis. The tactics involved change significantly for black if he plays 1. ... c5 versus 1. ... c6
Why? because of the different positions resulting from different control patterns in the centre...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
Black can play ...c6 and ...d5 against any opening! If you know the Slav and the Caro-Kann, then most of your games with Black will at least have similar pawn structures. In his "Black Defensive System for the Rest of Your Chess Career", GM Andrew Soltis recommends the Slav and Caro-Kann.
no argument against your statement that 1. ... c6 and 2. ... d5 can be played no matter what, but the Caro-Kann DOES get boring after awhile...
I mean, how many times can you play:
1. e4 c6
2. d4 d5
3. Nf3 dxe4
4. Nxe4 Bf5
5. Ng3 Bg6
6. Nf3 Nd7
7. h4 h6
8. h5 Bh7
9. Bd3 Bxd3
10. Qxd3

and for the first time, black can change it up. 10. ... e6 or 10. ... Qc7
you must admit that even with as solid as Caro-Kann is, it gets a bit boring/drawish after a while... I will say that it's a great alternative to Petroff's if black wants an almost garunteed draw...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rubberjaw30
no argument against your statement that 1. ... c6 and 2. ... d5 can be played no matter what, but the Caro-Kann DOES get boring after awhile...
I mean, how many times can you play:
1. e4 c6
2. d4 d5
3. Nf3 dxe4
4. Nxe4 Bf5
5. Ng3 Bg6
6. Nf3 Nd7
7. h4 h6
8. h5 Bh7
9. Bd3 Bxd3
10. Qxd3

and for the first time, black can change it up. ...[text shortened]... will say that it's a great alternative to Petroff's if black wants an almost garunteed draw...
I agree that the Caro-Kann often leads to boring positions. That's why I almost never play it anymore. I prefer more offbeat lines like 1 e4 Nc6 (Nimzovich Defense) and 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 c5 (the Marshall Variation of the French Defense).

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by exigentsky
... I don't just want to play what easily fits with my repertoire. I want to try to play the best moves.
I'm not sure there is such a thing as 'best' moves in the opening (at an amateur level at least). Personal preference and taste is probably more important than any apparent objective measure of "best"

Anyhoo, for reference I have played 1. Nf3 about 20 times over the last year or so (OTB).

Most popular responses where based on ... c6, ... d5 or KID (about a third of all games each).

I also got multiple games with ... f5 on move 1/early on and a similar number where black played lines based on ... d5, ...e5, ...Nf6.

Other moves where rare (e.g. 2. ... d5-d4, 2. ... dxc4) or non existent (e.g. I never once faced 1. ... c5)

So ... take your choice as you see fit.

Best of luck.

J

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.