Difficult to read through. Quite dense! Ah, the 'bolding' makes it better.
The main variation is correct. Note that 13. Bf6+ mates in a similar fashion (13. ... Kf8 14. Qe7+ Kg8 15. Qxg7 mate). It seems your subvariations are correct too - your turn.
Originally posted by heinzkat Difficult to read through. Quite dense! Ah, the 'bolding' makes it better.
The main variation is correct. Note that 13. Bf6+ mates in a similar fashion (13. ... Kf8 14. Qe7+ Kg8 15. Qxg7 mate). It seems your subvariations are correct too - your turn.
I used ChessBase to keep track of all the variations. I don't have a slick way to translate it to RHP yet, though; hence the many edits.
Originally posted by SwissGambit I used ChessBase to keep track of all the variations. I don't have a slick way to translate it to RHP yet, though; hence the many edits.
Next problem:
[fen]3bK3/1r1pp3/2bp4/6n1/3PkN2/1pP1N1P1/3n1PR1/Q7 w[/fen]
Mate in 4
Originally posted by heinzkat Thank you very much. Did you recognize the position or did you "Google" this?
I've seen it before here: http://www.logicalchess.com/resources/lessons/tactics/toughest/index.html
(The "4.Had enough" link), where the game is quoted. Then it was just a matter of searching in the databases for any games between the two players.
Originally posted by SwissGambit I used ChessBase to keep track of all the variations. I don't have a slick way to translate it to RHP yet, though; hence the many edits.
Next problem:
[fen]3bK3/1r1pp3/2bp4/6n1/3PkN2/1pP1N1P1/3n1PR1/Q7 w[/fen]
Mate in 4
Not composed by a Dutch but by Vukcevich (1982). Very nice. I couldn't solve it myself... I wonder if anyone else can find it?