Go back
Why even bother?

Why even bother?

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't get why people have rating limits for challenges. It's just not fair that people with ratings too low or too high can't challenge people. 😠

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
I don't get why people have rating limits for challenges. It's just not fair that people with ratings too low or too high can't challenge people. 😠
..Why wouldn't they? I personally don't like to play 1100s.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
I don't get why people have rating limits for challenges. It's just not fair that people with ratings too low or too high can't challenge people. 😠
because it's not worth the time of a 2000 to play a 1100.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
..Why wouldn't they? I personally don't like to play 1100s.
I'll play anyone for rating points. I'm not saying you shouldn't do that because I can't make you stop the rating challenges thing. Sometimes, I just have those unfortunate losses to players with a rating much lower than me. 😞

Clock
4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YUG0slav
because it's not worth the time of a 2000 to play a 1100.
You shouldn't under estimate players. I did and it costed me these games: 😞

Game 3417832 😳 :'( 😳 :'( 😳

Game 3413909 😳 :'( 😳 :'( 😳

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
I don't get why people have rating limits for challenges. It's just not fair that people with ratings too low or too high can't challenge people. 😠
because we're masochists and like to get kicked in the face. it builds character. lower rated players can only sucker punch us, if they're very very lucky. and that's just not enough pain to give us the pleasure we crave.


*boot to the head!*

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
You shouldn't under estimate players.

Game 3417832 😳 :'( 😳 :'( 😳

Game 3413909 😳 :'( 😳 :'( 😳
it doesn't apply that well when he's now rated higher than you...

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YUG0slav
it doesn't apply that well when he's now rated higher than you...
When I played them then, they were 1100-1200 range. 😞

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

For those subscribers, they have time to play much lower rated people since they have unlimited games. I'm also speaking for myself here. 😠

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
When I played them then, they were 1100-1200 range. 😞
Ya, provisionally 1200.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
For those subscribers, they have time to play much lower rated people since they have unlimited games.
I don't. even my current games are way too much for me.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
I don't. even my current games are way too much for me.
Same...I've hit 50!

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Same...I've hit 50!
I have 181 in progress! 😵

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Same...I've hit 50!
I'd like to get down to 10-15 games, so I'd have more energy for training and faster chess. but I suppose the starting of next tournament rounds will kill that dream for some time...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.