16 Dec '11 06:15>
Originally posted by iustusMr. iustus (a good latin name!) I would like to start by thanking you for your compliment. Sentiments like yours make it much more fulfilling to share! However I want to express some worry on behalf of your statement regarding thinking during your games. In a correspondence game you could certainly take these sorts of things into account. However at a board this type of consideration isn't overly valuable. My instruction was more for robbie's sake. Showing the power of the Queens bishop over the center when fianchettoed. Black holds the center down not with forceful occupation but instead by posting a "Ghost" on b7. It single handedly haunts whites position. My hope is that my explanations describe the problems a minor piece can present when properly utilized.
Q i like your style please keep writing this stuffs ive never thought of any of these things when i play my games
As I said, the b7 bishop is akin to a ghost. I don't expect my considerations with regards to time to be cogitated during a flesh and blood sequence. Instead focus on the liquidity of blacks defense! Understand that white can certainly shut down this singular piece. It is no baron of victory. Take the below example - even though black controls e4 well into the middlegame...and creates a great knight post there. White vaporizes this advantage and one of the greatest games ever played ends in a hard faught draw. Its the liquidity of blacks defense that is of value. I hope thats what you take away from my considerations!