I'm pretty sure the deferred wing gambit is better. Keres wrote a book on the wing gambit that may be worth looking into though. a3 planning b4 is interesting; I believe there is a book on it.
If you really want to nail sicilian players, buy experts versus the sicilian and be a man in the open sicilian 😛
Morra is rather boring though there are a lot of traps. A LOT. There's a reason the mainline starts like 3 or 4 moves in. A lot of natural moves lose.
Grand Prix is also fun, though best deferred because of the tal gambit.
I know there are way more, but the first one I think of is 1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nc3 d6 5. Bc4 Nf6 {a very tempting move for Open Sicilian players!} 6. e5! dxe5? and now 7. Bxf7+ Game over 1-0 .
And so black needs to prep that knight move, but it turns out that the natural ways of prepping fail a lot. It is very fun!
Originally posted by yofidawg Does it work? Worth looking into?
1.e4 c5 2.b4
1.e4 c5 2.Nf4 d6/e6/Nc6 3.b4
Which is better? Anyone use/have theory, or is it a waste of time?
The Wing Gambit is probably insufficient after 1.e4 c5 2.b4 cxb4 3.a3 d5. In my distant youth I did try to resurrect it with 3.c4!? but not entirely convincingly. It may be a little bit better after 2.Nf3 e6, but probably best of all against the O'Kelly variation (1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 a6 3.b4!?) since Nf3 is a much more useful move for white in the Wing Gambit than a6 is for black.
Originally posted by Fat Lady In my youth I won many a fantastic game using the Wing Gambit. In OTB chess it is great.
Originally posted by Korch or 2.c3
It does not mean that these systems are so harmless as many Sicilian players are thinking - in hands of skilled player who have good experience in playing of these systems, they can be dangerous. Especially against players who lacks experience to play against them.