2 edits
Often times one plays on just to show stubborn nature. I often resign at the first sign of a loss, but don't you THINK that in THIS lifetime, life is too short for a mere demonstration of tenacity. The OP TEACHER1 seems like an upright community member. So listen toi the GUY. His words ring the voice of truth. IS chess just A game, or is it a way of life? [b]NUTJOB
1 edit
The WHOLE point of chess IS to have FUN. If playing out losing POSITIONS is not fun, then WHY would you WANT to play THEM? But if playing a OUT losing position IS fun, and you like the PROSPECT of getting an UNLIKELY win by seeing your OPPONENT blunder away an EASY mate, then by ALL means, play out all your LOSING positons. And if eking out EVERY last possible RATING point is the ultimate reason YOU play CHESS, then by all means, EKE away!! To each HIS own.
The one thing i TRULY do not get - how exactly DOES capitalizing random WORDS add anything pleasurable TO the joys of POSTING here in the forums?
1 edit
Originally posted by SwissGambitGood point there - I'd say if you really want to win you should just play out the bare kings for thousands of moves hoping for your opponents flag to fall. These guys sure knew what they were do; certainly not quitters: Game 5003418
You know who also never wins? Those who get checkmated. 😵
And those who stalemate their opponent.
And those who accept or claim draws.
NEVER do any of those things if you want to WIN.
I thought white was getting close to a winning position when he gained the opposition around move 230, but he squandered his edge away in the end unfortunately.
- Joined
- 07 Mar 09
- Moves
- 32473
1 edit
Originally posted by clandarkfireYeah! Hold your finger on the arrow key and watch the little guys dance around the board! You'll learn so much!
Good point there - I'd say if you really want to win you should just play out the bare kings for thousands of moves hoping for your opponents flag to fall. These guys sure knew what they were do; certainly not quitters: Game 5003418
I thought white was getting close to a winning position when he gained the opposition around move 230, but he squandered his edge away in the end unfortunately.
Ha! You can learn just as much by going backwards!
Originally posted by clandarkfireNow who is chasing who is the question?
Good point there - I'd say if you really want to win you should just play out the bare kings for thousands of moves hoping for your opponents flag to fall. These guys sure knew what they were do; certainly not quitters: Game 5003418
I thought white was getting close to a winning position when he gained the opposition around move 230, but he squandered his edge away in the end unfortunately.
Originally posted by clandarkfireRepeat of my post of 08 Jun '10 17:45 in Thread No. 130796 'record for moves in a single game.'
Good point there - I'd say if you really want to win you should just play out the bare kings for thousands of moves hoping for your opponents flag to fall. These guys sure knew what they were do; certainly not quitters: Game 5003418
I thought white was getting close to a winning position when he gained the opposition around move 230, but he squandered his edge away in the end unfortunately.
In fact this game really ended at move 54, since the "Laws of Chess, Article 5: The completion of the game, section 2b." reads : -
"The game is drawn when a position has arisen in which neither player can checkmate the opponent’s king with any series of legal moves. The game is said to end in a ‘dead position’. This immediately ends the game, provided that the move producing the position was legal."
1 edit
Originally posted by clandarkfireActually it seems that it was a draw from move 54. But, according to the RHP rules, it is actually possible to win this game.
Good point there - I'd say if you really want to win you should just play out the bare kings for thousands of moves hoping for your opponents flag to fall. These guys sure knew what they were do; certainly not quitters: Game 5003418
(1) If the opponent resign. Perhaps as a part of a deal. "I win this and I let you win another."
(2) The opponent is short of time, and/or is sloppy with his tame manegement. "Just wating for the Skull to turn up!"
However, this game should ignite a discussed in the light of an auto-draw rule, according to the FIDE rules.
2 edits
Originally posted by FabianFnasbeing that the name of the tournament was "beat the skull" - with 1 day per move, and no apparent timebank - it's clear what each player was hoping for.
Actually it seems that it was a draw from move 54. But, according to the RHP rules, it is actually possible to win this game.
(1) If the opponent resign. Perhaps as a part of a deal. "I win this and I let you win another."
(2) The opponent is short of time, and/or is sloppy with his tame manegement. "Just wating for the Skull to turn up!"
However, th ...[text shortened]... me should ignite a discussed in the light of an auto-draw rule, according to the FIDE rules.