1. Joined
    21 Jul '06
    Moves
    0
    23 Aug '06 04:041 edit
    Bill has n+1 coins and Ben has n coins. They both throw all of their coins simultaneously and observe the number that come up heads. Assuming all the coins are fair, what is the probability that Bill gets more heads than Ben?
  2. Joined
    13 Apr '06
    Moves
    24617
    23 Aug '06 14:10
    combining your title and me not seeing the 's' on heads i didnt know where you was going with this..
    the answer is 100%? (hoping this is a brainteaser and not a maths one)
  3. Joined
    13 Jul '06
    Moves
    4229
    23 Aug '06 14:35
    Damnit I've forgotten stats. Is it n+1/n?
  4. Joined
    10 Aug '06
    Moves
    967
    23 Aug '06 15:04
    Originally posted by ThudanBlunder
    Bill has n+1 coins and Ben has n coins. They both throw all of their coins simultaneously and observe the number that come up heads. Assuming all the coins are fair, what is the probability that Bill gets more heads than Ben?
    50%
  5. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    23 Aug '06 15:061 edit
    lol, that's more than 100%.

    edit: replied to the (n+1)/n
  6. Standard memberPBE6
    Bananarama
    False berry
    Joined
    14 Feb '04
    Moves
    28719
    23 Aug '06 15:08
    Originally posted by ThudanBlunder
    Bill has n+1 coins and Ben has n coins. They both throw all of their coins simultaneously and observe the number that come up heads. Assuming all the coins are fair, what is the probability that Bill gets more heads than Ben?
    The probability of Bill getting "m" heads with his (n+1) coins is:

    (n+1)choose(m)/2^(n+1)

    The probability of Ben getting (m-1) or less heads with his "n" coins is:

    SUM{(n)choose(i)/2^n}, where i=0...(m-1)

    The probability of both these events happening simultaneously is simply their product. Now, to count all the possible outcomes we use the double sum:

    P = SUM{(n+1)choose(j)/2^(n+1) * SUM{(n)choose(i)/2^n}}, where j=1...n+1, and i=0...j-1

    For example, for n=10 at some point we would calculate the probability that Bill got 3 heads (j=3), and Bill got 0, 1, and 2 heads (i=0,1,2), at some other point we would calculate the probability that Bill got 8 heads (j=8), and Ben got 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 heads (i=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7), etc...

    I don't know if there's a good way to simplify the above expression, or if there's an easier "aha!" solution, but this one will give you the correct answer if you grind it out.
  7. Joined
    21 Jul '06
    Moves
    0
    23 Aug '06 16:013 edits
    Originally posted by PBE6
    I don't know if there's a good way to simplify the above expression, or if there's an easier "aha!" solution, but this one will give you the correct answer if you grind it out.
    I'm not sure if this is worth an "aha!":

    Probability of Bill getting more heads = probability of Bill getting more tails = 50% (as they can't both happen).
  8. Joined
    20 Feb '06
    Moves
    8407
    23 Aug '06 17:382 edits
    Originally posted by ThudanBlunder
    I'm not sure if this is worth an "aha!":

    Probability of Bill getting more heads = probability of Bill getting more tails = 50% (as they can't both happen).
    Yes I had:

    If A has k heads and n+1-k tails and B has j heads and n-j tails then

    P( k > j ) = P( n+1-k > n-j ) (*)

    by symmetry of heads/tails. Finally, for integers k and j

    n+1-k > n-j if and only if ( k < j or k=j )

    so the two events in (*) partition the sample space so each have probability 1/2.

    Yours is definitely "aha" though!
  9. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    23 Aug '06 22:17
    Always recycle 😉
  10. London
    Joined
    28 Sep '04
    Moves
    110329
    23 Aug '06 22:221 edit
    [i]what is the probability that Bill gets more head than Ben?[/b]
    [/i]I imagine this will have a lot to do with looks/size.
  11. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    2827
    08 Oct '06 15:04
    it depends on the value of n
  12. Joined
    13 Oct '06
    Moves
    124
    16 Oct '06 02:15
    I'd say it was still a 50% probability because there'd now be an odd number of coins between them and the most probable outcome would be that the +1 would be the deciding coin.
  13. Joined
    25 Aug '06
    Moves
    0
    16 Oct '06 03:59
    0.5
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree