while i agree that bush sucks @ss, at elections, there were good reasons to vote for him, for instance, gore wanted to impose stricter gun laws. guns have been baned in UK and austrilia, and in both places violent crime has gone up.
(no offence to brits, london rules, also no offence to auzzies, aquidnas and platipusses likewise rule.)
Originally posted by fearlessleaderDo really think crime has gone up because no one has guns? If so, how do you explain our high crime rate where guns are readily available vs. their much lower crime rates where guns are banned. I'm not for banning guns in the U.S.A. or anything, but I think we do need stricter laws, to prevent the wrong people from getting their hands on them.
while i agree that bush sucks @ss, at elections, there were good reasons to vote for him, for instance, gore wanted to impose stricter gun laws. guns have been baned in UK and austrilia, and in both places violent crime has gone up.
(no offence to brits, london rules, also no offence to auzzies, aquidnas and platipusses likewise rule.)
Originally posted by palominegun regulations, sure, but banning guns, or making them inacsesable to common citizens just garentees that only pepole who don't care about the law to begin with will be able to get them. even if a violent criminal could not get a gun, he would still be able to kill pepole with a knife, but pedestyans can't defend themselves with knives, they dont know how.
Do really think crime has gone up because no one has guns? If so, how do you explain our high crime rate where guns are readily available vs. their much lower crime rates where guns are banned. I'm not for banning guns in the U.S.A. or anything, but I think we do need stricter laws, to prevent the wrong people from getting their hands on them.