Go back
Cut the chess board

Cut the chess board

Posers and Puzzles

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Can you cut a chess board into four rectangles so they have the ratios 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4 respectively?
You cannot cut squares in parts.

G

Joined
29 Jun 06
Moves
41148
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think you cannot do that. Maybe my calculations are wrong:
I suggest letting x be the largest part of the board. Then we can rite the following equasion:
x + 1/2x + 1/3x + 1/4x = 64
Multiply the equasion by 12:
12x + 6x + 4x + 3x = 768
x = 30.72

D

Joined
25 Aug 06
Moves
0
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Can you cut a chess board into four rectangles so they have the ratios 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4 respectively?
You cannot cut squares in parts.
Lets see...

To cut the board into 4 rectangles, we must make 3 paralle cuts or 2 perpendicular cuts.

The first option is impossible since the 1:1 rectangle is a square.

The second option is impossible since the rectangle having no common edge with the 1:1 rectangle is a square, but 1:2, 1:3, 1:4 are not squares.

So there is no solution, even if cutting squares in parts is allowed.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
14 Apr 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, a square is a special kind of rectangle with the ratio 1:1. We do agree on this, don't we?

G

Joined
29 Jun 06
Moves
41148
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh, I misunderstood the question. I thought you meant that the rectangles relate to each other as 1 to 1, 1 to 2 and so on by their square.

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Easier to say with a diagram, but split into the following blocks:

a1->d8 (2:1)
e1->f8 (4:1)
g1->h6 (3:1)
g7->h8 (1:1)

I got there by looking for +ve integer solutions to a^2 + 2b^2 + 3c^2 + 4d^2 = 64.

deriver69
Keeps

Shanghai

Joined
16 Feb 06
Moves
132461
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

* *|* * * * * *
* *|* * * * * *
-----------------
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
-----------------
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *

deriver69
Keeps

Shanghai

Joined
16 Feb 06
Moves
132461
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think I used a simlar method, the areas of the simpler ratios were 1,2,3 and 4. I then multiplied these by 4 to make a total of 64 (doubling the sizes). This was a slight hunch because 64=2^6 so I assumed trebling would not help.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Totally correct! Well done.
(and nice graphics, deriver69 !)

J

In Christ

Joined
30 Apr 07
Moves
172
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Can you cut the chessboard into four congruent shapes, each of which contains exactly one of the following squares: a1, b2, c3, d4?

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jirakon
Can you cut the chessboard into four congruent shapes, each of which contains exactly one of the following squares: a1, b2, c3, d4?

D

Joined
25 Aug 06
Moves
0
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by David113
Lets see...

To cut the board into 4 rectangles, we must make 3 paralle cuts or 2 perpendicular cuts.

The first option is impossible since the 1:1 rectangle is a square.

The second option is impossible since the rectangle having no common edge with the 1:1 rectangle is a square, but 1:2, 1:3, 1:4 are not squares.

So there is no solution, even if cutting squares in parts is allowed.
Shame:'(
I forgot the third way, which gives a solution🙁

s

Montgomery

Joined
17 Mar 06
Moves
7336
Clock
14 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mtthw
[fen]pRRRRRRR/pRrrrrrr/pRrPPPPr/pRrPppPr/pRrrRpPr/pRRRRpPr/ppppppPr/PPPPPPPr[/fen]
I like mine better.. 😛

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26757
Clock
18 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mtthw
[fen]pRRRRRRR/pRrrrrrr/pRrPPPPr/pRrPppPr/pRrrRpPr/pRRRRpPr/ppppppPr/PPPPPPPr[/fen]
Great. A swastika.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26757
Clock
18 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Guych
I think you cannot do that. Maybe my calculations are wrong:
I suggest letting x be the largest part of the board. Then we can rite the following equasion:
x + 1/2x + 1/3x + 1/4x = 64
Multiply the equasion by 12:
12x + 6x + 4x + 3x = 768
x = 30.72
You're calculating areas. The problem is about ratios.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.