05 Oct '07 15:25>
I did say no brackets
Originally posted by sonhouseThe problem with your answer is not that its negative (if anyone can get below zero then I imagine that would win) but thwe question quite clearly stipulates using the numbers 1-9. That is different to using the digits 1-9.
Exactly how does that violate the requirements of the first post? A negative number is lower than zero in ANYONE's maths book. I can't help it if he defined the problem inexactly. If he wanted the series end to be exaclty zero he should have specified that. There was no such specification, therefore any negative number is a valid answer.
He specified, and ...[text shortened]... lowest number you can get to?"
Hey, so I am lawyering up, that's what logic is all about🙂
Originally posted by wolfgang59You lost me on that one. What is the difference between numbers and digits? They sound like the same beast to me.
The problem with your answer is not that its negative (if anyone can get below zero then I imagine that would win) but thwe question quite clearly stipulates using the numbers 1-9. That is different to using the digits 1-9.
Originally posted by sonhouseTwo numbers - one and four.
You lost me on that one. What is the difference between numbers and digits? They sound like the same beast to me.
Originally posted by sonhouseAnother way of thinking about difference of numbers and digits is to consider problem in another base.
You lost me on that one. What is the difference between numbers and digits? They sound like the same beast to me.
Originally posted by sonhouseOh, I had no problem with the negatives, I beat your score on that one :p
Exactly how does that violate the requirements of the first post? A negative number is lower than zero in ANYONE's maths book. I can't help it if he defined the problem inexactly. If he wanted the series end to be exaclty zero he should have specified that. There was no such specification, therefore any negative number is a valid answer.
He specified, and ...[text shortened]... lowest number you can get to?"
Hey, so I am lawyering up, that's what logic is all about🙂
Originally posted by TheMaster37I hate when my students do that too.
Oh, I had no problem with the negatives, I beat your score on that one :p
My problem was with the following:
"1E6 /5=200,000/8=25,000/4=6250/2=3125-(97631)=-94506"
1,000,000 = -94506 ? I sure hope not!
Sadly, students do this all too often. You meant it well, but what you typed is simply wrong 🙂
Originally posted by TheMaster37Well none of the answers would be right in that logic, 1,000,000=11? What's the dif between that and 1,000,000=-94000?
Oh, I had no problem with the negatives, I beat your score on that one :p
My problem was with the following:
"1E6 /5=200,000/8=25,000/4=6250/2=3125-(97631)=-94506"
1,000,000 = -94506 ? I sure hope not!
Sadly, students do this all too often. You meant it well, but what you typed is simply wrong 🙂