Go back
Minimize function

Minimize function

Posers and Puzzles

Vote Up
Vote Down

f(x)=x^x
What positive value of x minimizes the function? Just an interesting thing I discovered...

Vote Up
Vote Down

0.36788 (5 sf)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
0.36788 (5 sf)
Right, but what is that exactly equal to?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
f(x)=x^x
What positive value of x minimizes the function? Just an interesting thing I discovered...
x = 1/e is the solution.

used log differentiation to get f'(x) = (1 + ln(x)) x^x. Set this to 0, and x^x cannot be 0, so (1+ln(x)) must be 0, so x = 1/e. I am not going to test for concavity, because it is pretty clear the x^x is concave up.

Is that a satisfactory answer for you, ark?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rheymans
x = 1/e is the solution.

used log differentiation to get f'(x) = (1 + ln(x)) x^x. Set this to 0, and x^x cannot be 0, so (1+ln(x)) must be 0, so x = 1/e. I am not going to test for concavity, because it is pretty clear the x^x is concave up.

Is that a satisfactory answer for you, ark?
Correct! Great job. 🙂

What about the positive value of x (in terms of e) which minimizes f(x)=x^(x^x) ? This one I don't know the answer to yet.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Correct! Great job. 🙂

What about the positive value of x (in terms of e) which minimizes f(x)=x^(x^x) ? This one I don't know the answer to yet.
I just checked it out. That function increases monotonically, and the limit of the function as you approach 0 is 0, so there is no actual minimum. You can say 0 is the greatest lower bound for this function, however.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PBE6
I just checked it out. That function increases monotonically, and the limit of the function as you approach 0 is 0, so there is no actual minimum. You can say 0 is the greatest lower bound for this function, however.
f(0) doesn't exist. Neither does f(x) for any negative non-integer value (and x=-0.2).
The limit as x approaches zero from the positive side (there is no limit approaching from the negative side) is 1.

The lower bound of the function is in fact -1.379 (at x=-0.2). The lower bound in the positive domain is 1/e.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
f(0) doesn't exist. Neither does f(x) for any negative non-integer value (and x=-0.2).
The limit as x approaches zero from the positive side (there is no limit approaching from the negative side) is 1.

The lower bound of the function is in fact -1.379 (at x=-0.2). The lower bound in the positive domain is 1/e.
You're checking out the wrong function, XanthosNZ. ark13 is asking about x^(x^x), not (x^x)^x. x^(x^x) tends to 0 as x approaches 0 from the positive side, whereas (x^x)^x tends to 1 as you stated. ark13 is also asking about the positive value(s) that minimize said function. Although x=-0.2 does give a value less than 0 for both functions, it does not minimize either function, as any odd negative integer for x will give you a more negative value. But you are right when you say f(0) does not exist (for either function).

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Whoops, sorry I meant f(x)=(x^x)^x 😳 Sorry about that. And yes, I did want the positive value of x.

My calculations gave the positive x min at approx. 0.60653176 and the value at .83198595

I was just curious if anyone could use logarithms to find the x value in terms of e as was done on the previous problem.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Whoops, sorry I meant f(x)=(x^x)^x 😳 Sorry about that. And yes, I did want the positive value of x.

My calculations gave the positive x min at approx. 0.60653176 and the value at .83198595

I was just curious if anyone could use logarithms to find the x value in terms of e as was done on the previous problem.
Hmm, it looks like I was checking out the wrong function. Curses!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PBE6
Hmm, it looks like I was checking out the wrong function. Curses!!
Yep, my bad. It was what I said, but not what I meant to say. And although quoting Dr. Seuss will only confuse people further, as it's contrary to what I just said, I will anyway. "I meant what I said, and I said what I meant."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Whoops, sorry I meant f(x)=(x^x)^x 😳 Sorry about that. And yes, I did want the positive value of x.

My calculations gave the positive x min at approx. 0.60653176 and the value at .83198595

I was just curious if anyone could use logarithms to find the x value in terms of e as was done on the previous problem.
So, your function is x^(x^2) then. I only get one min at 1/(sqrt(e)).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rheymans
So, your function is x^(x^2) then. I only get one min at 1/(sqrt(e)).
Nice, you did it again! It's 1/ sqrt (e)

The result is easy enough to get, the trick is to find it in terms of e.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Nice, you did it again! It's 1/ sqrt (e)

The result is easy enough to get, the trick is to find it in terms of e.
😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rheymans
😀
From these results, we can assume that the positive minimizing value of x in x^x^x^x is 1/cubrt (e), and etc. Almost makes you wonder why names of operations stop at exponents. Why isn't there an operation that is the number of times a number is put to it's own power? Well, I guess they had to stop somewhere.