1. Standard memberPBE6
    Bananarama
    False berry
    Joined
    14 Feb '04
    Moves
    28719
    09 Jun '08 20:11
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    PBE6, your predictable interruptions are consistently getting tiresome and tedious, your general non-contributions are poorly worded. Get a grip my man.
    [/dragontits]
    Lulz! 😀
  2. Standard memberuzless
    The So Fist
    Voice of Reason
    Joined
    28 Mar '06
    Moves
    9908
    09 Jun '08 20:42
    Originally posted by twilight2007
    Due to the stimulating questions here, this question might have been posted earlier. Sorry if it has. Also this question involves an airplane. I just used the word "plane" for the alliteration.

    There are 100 people on a plane. Let's label them Persons 1-100. The order the people sit down is determined by his or her seat number. There are 100 seats, l ...[text shortened]... did, please feel free to say so.

    If this isn't solved by tomorrow, I'll give a hint.😀
    Seems like one of those "YES/No" trick questions which work out to a 50% probobility.
  3. Standard memberTheMaster37
    Kupikupopo!
    Out of my mind
    Joined
    25 Oct '02
    Moves
    20443
    10 Jun '08 07:06
    Originally posted by eldragonfly
    thanks, geepamoogle likes to hide behind "evasive" terminology as you will soon witness yourself, and yes i did happen to read the entire thread.
    Obviously you didn't, as this problem has been solved AND proven. Yet you still claim a wrong answer to be right.
  4. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    10 Jun '08 12:501 edit
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    OK.
    Lets call the probability of someone sitting in the nth seat on an n-seater plane P(n)

    For n=2
    P(2) = 1/2 (the first guy either takes seat 1 or seat 2)

    For n=3
    P(3) = the chance of first guy sitting in seat + chance of first guy NOT sitting in seat x 2seater scenario

    Therefore
    P(3) = 1/3 + 2/3 * P(2)
    = 1/3 + 1/3
    = 2/3

    P ...[text shortened]... holder of ticket 100 getting his seat is 1/100.

    Which is surprising .. so I could be wrong!
    Edit - Same as below.
  5. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    10 Jun '08 13:011 edit
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    The 2/3 chance he will not take seat 1 is correct.

    Person 1 chooses seat 1 : chance 1/3
    .....Person 2 chooses 2 and person 3 chooses 3. So in this
    .....scenario, person 3 ends up in seat 3.
    Person 1 chooses seat 2 : chance 1/3
    .....Person 2 chooses seat 1 : chance 1/2
    ..........Person 3 ends up in seat 3.
    .....Person 2 chooses seat 3 : chance 1 ...[text shortened]... in seat 3

    Total chance of person 3 ending up in seat 3:

    1/3 + 1/3 * 1/2 = 1/3 + 1/6 = 1/2.
    Edited out because I misread the problem.
  6. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16870
    10 Jun '08 23:28
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    Obviously you didn't, as this problem has been solved AND proven. Yet you still claim a wrong answer to be right.
    show me the proof, playing around with p(3) is not the same as proving p(100) = 1/2
  7. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    11 Jun '08 09:182 edits
    Originally posted by eldragonfly
    show me the proof, playing around with p(3) is not the same as proving p(100) = 1/2
    P(2) = 1/2
    P(3) = 1/3+1/3*1/2 = 1/3(1+1/2) = 1/3*3/2 = 1/2
    P(4) = 1/4+1/4*1/3+1/4*1/2+1/4*1/3*1/2 = 1/4*(1+1/3)*(1+1/2) = 1/4*4/3*3/2 = 1/2
    P(5) = 1/5*(1+1/4)*(1+1/3)*(1+1/2) = 1/5*5/4*4/3*3/2*1/2 = 1/2
    ...

    P(n) = 1/n*(1+1/(n-1))*(1+1/(n-2))*...*(1+1/2) = (1/n)*(n/(n-1))*((n-1)/n-2))*((n-2)/n-3))*...*4/3*2/3*1/2

    The numerators and denominators cancel diagonally except for the first numerator and last denominator.

    Hence P(n) = 1/2
  8. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16870
    11 Jun '08 16:401 edit
    but p(100) can end up in either seat 1 or 100 or 99 depending on which seat p(1) picks at random/displaces.
  9. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    11 Jun '08 18:54
    Originally posted by eldragonfly
    but p(100) can end up in either seat 1 or 100 or 99 depending on which seat p(1) picks at random/displaces.
    I just proved it for all n. If you don't understand the proof, then try again.
  10. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16870
    11 Jun '08 19:15
    Originally posted by Palynka
    I just proved it for all n. If you don't understand the proof, then try again.
    yes, p-100 will either end up in seat 1 or 100.
  11. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16870
    11 Jun '08 19:214 edits
    Originally posted by twilight2007
    Due to the stimulating questions here, this question might have been posted earlier. Sorry if it has. Also this question involves an airplane. I just used the word "plane" for the alliteration.

    There are 100 people on a plane. Let's label them Persons 1-100. The order the people sit down is determined by his or her seat number. There are 100 seats, l did, please feel free to say so.

    If this isn't solved by tomorrow, I'll give a hint.😀
    Is this the correct stipulation? That is that only person-1 will choose a seat at random and all the rest of the passengers - except the displaced person will sit in their assigned seats.
  12. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16870
    11 Jun '08 20:351 edit
    nevermind
    nevermind
  13. Joined
    15 Feb '07
    Moves
    667
    11 Jun '08 22:441 edit
    Originally posted by eldragonfly
    rephrase/reword this, impossible to understand.
    The original question focused on the 100th and last man. My question was essentially if there was a formula for the odds for a specific other passenger to be displaced, if you knew his boarding number.

    I gave you the for instance of Passenger #2, but I could have just as easily asked for the chance Passenger #99 or Passenger #50 got to sit in their proper seat.

    So my challenge is to generalize a solution to this question.

    What are the odds Passenger #X gets to sit in their own seat?

    or if you prefer

    What are the odds Passenger #X gets displaced by a previous passenger?

    I will stand by my answer of 50% for the final passenger, and the explanation I gave.

    And to the poser of the original question, I don't think your question was unclear on the matter of seating odds at all. Just covering all the bases.
  14. Joined
    05 Jun '07
    Moves
    906
    12 Jun '08 02:35
    BTW I forgot to mention only one person per seat. I say this now so that no one will say it later.
  15. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16870
    12 Jun '08 17:17
    first approach: It seems that the intuitive solution is that person-100 can only be bumped by either person-1 or person-99, in either case he must take seat-1.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree