1. Standard membertelerion
    True X X Xian
    The Lord's Army
    Joined
    18 Jul '04
    Moves
    8353
    24 Sep '04 01:521 edit
    Answer the following two questions.

    Please limit your answers to the options provided. No explainations from you needed at this point. Just a one-letter response is sufficient. Please do not post questions. Instead message them to me.

    Ok here goes.

    The following description applies to both questions.

    There is an urn that contains 300 balls. 100 of the balls are red and 200 of the balls are either blue or green (Note: This does not imply that all 200 balls are the same color. It may be that some are blue and the others green. Maybe all are green. Maybe all are blue.)

    Now there are two gambles, Gamble A and Gamble B.

    Gamble A: You receive $1,000 if the ball is red.
    Gamble B: You receive $1,000 if the ball is blue.

    Which gamble do you prefer?

    Ok. Got one?

    Now choose from two different gambles.

    Gamble C: You receive $1,000 if the ball is not red.
    Gamble D: You receive $1,000 if the ball is not blue.

    Which gamble do you prefer?

    Please give your first responses to the questions (i.e. Please do not reconsider any question after answering it.)

    Thanks for you participation.

    I'll keep a tally and fill every interested party in on this in a day or two.
  2. Joined
    28 Jul '04
    Moves
    70104
    24 Sep '04 02:03

    I calculated that A and B have a 1/3 probability, C and D have 2/3 probability. Hence would go for either C or D. 🙂
  3. Standard membertelerion
    True X X Xian
    The Lord's Army
    Joined
    18 Jul '04
    Moves
    8353
    24 Sep '04 02:08
    Actually I need you to choose between A and B. Then choose between C and D. So valid responses are members of the set {AC, AD, BC, BD}There isn't necessarily a wrong answer here. 🙂
  4. Los Angeles
    Joined
    16 Jul '04
    Moves
    49831
    24 Sep '04 03:14
    B

    C

    oishi
  5. Behind you...
    Joined
    24 Feb '04
    Moves
    28311
    24 Sep '04 03:28
    B, C


    -Kev
  6. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    24 Sep '04 03:40
    Choosing A over B and C over D is contradictory.

    I don't think I can really make a choice.
  7. Donationbbarr
    Chief Justice
    Center of Contention
    Joined
    14 Jun '02
    Moves
    17381
    24 Sep '04 03:51
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    Choosing A over B and C over D is contradictory.

    I don't think I can really make a choice.
    Don't you mean that choosing A over B or C over D is arbitrary?
  8. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    24 Sep '04 03:532 edits
    Originally posted by bbarr
    Don't you mean that choosing A over B [b]or C over D is arbitrary?[/b]
    Simultaneously saying A>B and C>D entails a contradiction. Otherwise, classical probability is totally unable to deal with this question because the distributions are not given, or even hinted at.

    I think alternative systems for making such a decision exist, I just don't know what they are.
  9. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    24 Sep '04 04:01
    Saying A better than B is saying P(red) > P(blue) while C over D is saying P(red,green) < P(blue,green). Since P(any two colors simultaneously) = 0, this is equivalent to saying P(blue) > P(red), a truly Feivelian construction.
  10. Standard membertelerion
    True X X Xian
    The Lord's Army
    Joined
    18 Jul '04
    Moves
    8353
    24 Sep '04 04:29
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    Saying A better than B is saying P(red) > P(blue) while C over D is saying P(red,green) < P(blue,green). Since P(any two colors simultaneously) = 0, this is equivalent to saying P(blue) > P(red), a truly Feivelian construction.
    Royal don't spoil the fun . . . 🙂
  11. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    24 Sep '04 04:30
    Originally posted by telerion
    Royal don't spoil the fun . . . 🙂
    Sorry to spoil your fun just to get my kicks at Feivel.

    However, I didn't shed any light on the right procedure, so it's chill.

    In Apologizingforbeingsuchageekship,

    RC
  12. DonationAcolyte
    Now With Added BA
    Loughborough
    Joined
    04 Jul '02
    Moves
    3790
    24 Sep '04 16:35
    Originally posted by telerion
    Answer the following two questions.

    Please limit your answers to the options provided. No explainations from you needed at this point. Just a one-letter response is sufficient. Please do not post questions. Instead message them to me.

    Ok here goes.

    The following description applies to both questions.

    There is an urn that contains 300 balls. 100 ...[text shortened]... rticipation.

    I'll keep a tally and fill every interested party in on this in a day or two.
    Without doing the calculations and with a fairly obvious assumption, I'd guess that (B,D) is the worst choice as it maximises variance, and the others are equally good. However, if we're allowed to know the result of the first gamble before picking the second, then I'd go B, followed by D if I lost the first gamble and C if I won it.
  13. DonationAcolyte
    Now With Added BA
    Loughborough
    Joined
    04 Jul '02
    Moves
    3790
    24 Sep '04 16:36
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    Simultaneously saying A>B and C>D entails a contradiction. Otherwise, classical probability is totally unable to deal with this question because the distributions are not given, or even hinted at.

    I think alternative systems for making such a decision exist, I just don't know what they are.
    Go go gagdet Bayesian probability!
  14. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    24 Sep '04 16:57
    Originally posted by Acolyte
    Go go gagdet Bayesian probability!
    My parents and I are about to pay large sums to have a guy in a cardigan explain that to me 😉.
  15. Standard membertelerion
    True X X Xian
    The Lord's Army
    Joined
    18 Jul '04
    Moves
    8353
    24 Sep '04 17:08
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    My parents and I are about to pay large sums to have a guy in a cardigan explain that to me 😉.
    Yeah going through some of that right now.

    Professor: You silly students thought that after a year you had econometrics down? All the hard stuff was behind you? Forget it! Now were going to change up the statistical assumptions and start fresh!

    Me: Uh . . . I had classical econometrics down?
Back to Top