1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    04 Dec '06 03:23
    Not a puzzle but it's neat anyway, a differant way to multiply:
    http://www.shoutfile.com/v/fbpANixx/Easy_Mental_Multiplication_Trick
  2. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    04 Dec '06 05:00
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Not a puzzle but it's neat anyway, a differant way to multiply:
    http://www.shoutfile.com/v/fbpANixx/Easy_Mental_Multiplication_Trick
    Just hope that the numbers don't have lots of 9's.
  3. Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    72627
    04 Dec '06 06:25
    BigDogg, has anyone ever told you that you're a bit of a downer? So many of your posts are condescending.
  4. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    04 Dec '06 06:38
    Originally posted by dmnelson84
    BigDogg, has anyone ever told you that you're a bit of a downer? So many of your posts are condescending.
    Yes, I'm skeptical by nature. Sorry, but the thought of that poor sap drawing nine lines for every 'nine', and then counting all the myriad intersections, and then doing all the 'carrying' just struck me as funny.
  5. Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    72627
    04 Dec '06 06:401 edit
    In your case, skeptical is just a euphemism for rude.
  6. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    04 Dec '06 06:59
    Originally posted by dmnelson84
    In your case, skeptical is just a euphemism for rude.
    I've got a pretty neat trick for doing multiplication in your head. Successive approximation.

    To take the example in the video: 21 x 13.

    10 * 2 * 13 = 260
    +
    1*13
    =
    273

    And a harder example: 54 x 37

    50 * 40 = 2000
    -
    50 * 3
    1850
    4 * 40 = 160
    -
    4 * 3
    148
    1850 + 148 = 1998

    Why would you need more tricks than this?
  7. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    04 Dec '06 17:491 edit
    Originally posted by dmnelson84
    In your case, skeptical is just a euphemism for rude.
    It appears I may have offended your delicate sensibilities somewhere, but I don't really care.
  8. Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    72627
    04 Dec '06 18:24
    Thanks for proving my point.
  9. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    04 Dec '06 18:51
    Originally posted by dmnelson84
    Thanks for proving my point.
    By the way, what does all this have to with a "Math Trick" thread? Do you agree or disagree that the trick shown has little practical value?
  10. Standard memberuzless
    The So Fist
    Voice of Reason
    Joined
    28 Mar '06
    Moves
    9908
    04 Dec '06 18:56
    Originally posted by dmnelson84
    In your case, skeptical is just a euphemism for rude.
    that's pretty rude
  11. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    04 Dec '06 19:501 edit
    Neat trick, totally impractical. I just wonder how many people can prove why it works*.

    😵


    *should be trivial if you know how multiplication works (I too am a skeptic).
  12. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    04 Dec '06 20:041 edit
    I disagree with most of the remarks made above. The principle is very good, and can be applied without doing the graphics (and regardless the number of 9's). Only, you have to do the exercise from right to left, so you can write down the solution from right to left character by character without overloading your memory. In real-life exercises, once the person has acquired the skill, multpilications of 5x5 numbers can be done 10+ times faster by the same person than with any other manual method.
  13. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    04 Dec '06 20:07
    Originally posted by zebano
    Neat trick, totally impractical. I just wonder how many people can prove why it works*.

    😵


    *should be trivial if you know how multiplication works (I too am a skeptic).
    Using marbles, I can represent 3*2 as 3 groups of two marbles each. The trick on the video simply substitutes line intersections for marbles. The lines are all drawn diagonally to keep the proper order of magnitude for each number.

    However, try the intersection trick for 9*9, and you will see why we use times tables instead.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree