1. Account suspended
    Joined
    07 May '04
    Moves
    10805
    15 Jul '04 11:43
  2. Zeist, Holland
    Joined
    11 Sep '03
    Moves
    19384
    15 Jul '04 11:51
    Originally posted by STANG
    Very relaxing indeed! Thank you ๐Ÿ™„
  3. my head
    Joined
    03 Oct '03
    Moves
    671
    21 Jul '04 22:23
    Originally posted by STANG
    it's odvious: it's the fourth one.
  4. in complete
    Joined
    21 Jul '01
    Moves
    23852
    22 Jul '04 07:46
    Originally posted by fearlessleader
    it's odvious: it's the fourth one.
    How can it be the fourth one? If you read the sixth carefully, it obviously discounts the fourth, leaving only the second as a viable option - either you have fallen for the red herring or I am missing something!
  5. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    22 Jul '04 16:24
    Simple!























  6. my head
    Joined
    03 Oct '03
    Moves
    671
    23 Jul '04 22:521 edit
    Originally posted by kody magic
    How can it be the fourth one? If you read the sixth carefully, it obviously discounts the fourth, leaving only the second as a viable option - either you have fallen for the red herring or I am missing something!
    i'm fairly certain it's the fourth:

    the sixth is modified by the naidar, as is the second, thus acording to the third nither can be valid. the third must be valid, acording to epsolon. that leavs the fourth as the only applicable option. here's a more compleat explination:



    K^?

    n [p





    5



    ?^K +0!@b








    ++==++
    3#r
    4#t
    5#s



    get it?
  7. in complete
    Joined
    21 Jul '01
    Moves
    23852
    26 Jul '04 11:32
    Originally posted by fearlessleader
    i'm fairly certain it's the fourth:

    the sixth is modified by the naidar, as is the second, thus acording to the third nither can be valid. the third must be valid, acording to epsolon. that leavs the fourth as the only applicable option. here's a more compleat explination:



    K^?

    n [p





    ...[text shortened]... 4#t
    5#s



    get it?
    I see your error!! Vodant's theory expressly prevents the holdum of the danthan, thus K^? becomes 3?^Kn.

    Also, I think you have transposed 'and' and 'but', which gives you 3#r, but 'but' and 'and' read correctly gives 3.2#r.
  8. my head
    Joined
    03 Oct '03
    Moves
    671
    26 Jul '04 22:49
    Originally posted by kody magic
    I see your error!! Vodant's theory expressly prevents the holdum of the danthan, thus K^? becomes 3?^Kn.

    Also, I think you have transposed 'and' and 'but', which gives you 3#r, but 'but' and 'and' read correctly gives 3.2#r.
    your right๐Ÿ™‚ (damn it๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ )

    try this one:
















    ~

    ~

    ~













  9. in complete
    Joined
    21 Jul '01
    Moves
    23852
    27 Jul '04 18:38
    Originally posted by fearlessleader
    your right๐Ÿ™‚ (damn it๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ˜ )

    try this one:
















    ~

    ~

    ~













    A little trickier, but I'd say 44^7_89 on a Thursday.

    (My first thought was East Spalding, but I think you were trying to lead me down the wrong path!!)
  10. my head
    Joined
    03 Oct '03
    Moves
    671
    27 Jul '04 21:59
    Originally posted by kody magic
    A little trickier, but I'd say 44^7_89 on a Thursday.

    (My first thought was East Spalding, but I think you were trying to lead me down the wrong path!!)
    correct๐Ÿ˜€
  11. my head
    Joined
    03 Oct '03
    Moves
    671
    04 Aug '04 20:49
    anyone else know any good ones?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree