23 Jul 04
1 edit
Originally posted by kody magici'm fairly certain it's the fourth:
How can it be the fourth one? If you read the sixth carefully, it obviously discounts the fourth, leaving only the second as a viable option - either you have fallen for the red herring or I am missing something!
the sixth is modified by the naidar, as is the second, thus acording to the third nither can be valid. the third must be valid, acording to epsolon. that leavs the fourth as the only applicable option. here's a more compleat explination:
K^?
n [p
5
?^K +0!@b
++==++
3#r
4#t
5#s
get it?
26 Jul 04
Originally posted by fearlessleaderI see your error!! Vodant's theory expressly prevents the holdum of the danthan, thus K^? becomes 3?^Kn.
i'm fairly certain it's the fourth:
the sixth is modified by the naidar, as is the second, thus acording to the third nither can be valid. the third must be valid, acording to epsolon. that leavs the fourth as the only applicable option. here's a more compleat explination:
K^?
n [p
...[text shortened]... 4#t
5#s
get it?
Also, I think you have transposed 'and' and 'but', which gives you 3#r, but 'but' and 'and' read correctly gives 3.2#r.
26 Jul 04
Originally posted by kody magicyour right🙂 (damn it😠😠😠😠😠😠)
I see your error!! Vodant's theory expressly prevents the holdum of the danthan, thus K^? becomes 3?^Kn.
Also, I think you have transposed 'and' and 'but', which gives you 3#r, but 'but' and 'and' read correctly gives 3.2#r.
try this one:
~
~
~