1. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    25429
    12 Jan '12 00:55
    Change this:


    To This:



    By removing three types of wetland.

    (yes I'm bored.)
  2. Standard memberwolfgang59
    howling mad
    In the den
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    12 Jan '12 22:39
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Change this:

    ...By removing three types of wetland.

    (yes I'm bored.)
    Shouldnt that be by removing a type of wetland three times?
  3. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    25429
    13 Jan '12 02:46
    Hi Wolfgang.

    You can put it anyway you want.

    Or you can take away three half fences. It's up to you.
  4. In your face
    Joined
    21 Aug '04
    Moves
    55993
    14 Jan '12 23:46
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Change this:

    [fen][fen][fen][fen]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1[/fen]
    To This:

    [fen]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1[/fen]

    By removing three types of wetland.

    (yes I'm bored.)
    No. Make me!!!
  5. Standard memberwolfgang59
    howling mad
    In the den
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    15 Jan '12 21:28
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Hi Wolfgang.

    You can put it anyway you want.

    Or you can take away three half fences. It's up to you.
    Or the centre of your defence ...
  6. Standard memberforkedknight
    Defend the Universe
    127.0.0.1
    Joined
    18 Dec '03
    Moves
    16018
    17 Jan '12 00:07
    Sorry, I don't follow.
  7. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    25429
    19 Jan '12 03:012 edits
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Change this:

    [fen][fen][fen][fen]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1[/fen]
    To This:

    [fen]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1[/fen]

    By removing three types of wetland.

    (yes I'm bored.)
    Forgot about this - I'll give the solution.

    If you look at the Reply & Quote you will see the first diagram was created with:

    [fen][fen][fen][fen]

    Putting[fen][fen][fen][fen] infront of the starting position gives you.



    So if you remove 3 fens. (fen as in wet land and deFENce etc.) you get



    As I said. I was bored.
  8. Joined
    26 Apr '03
    Moves
    25828
    19 Jan '12 21:19
    why does [fen][fen][fen] do that?????
  9. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    25429
    20 Jan '12 14:564 edits
    I have no idea.

    It may be something to do with the White King and Black Knight.

    putting [fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen][fen] infront on the initial position.




    Gives you this.



    after that is does not seem to matter how many 'fens' you place infront you always get this.
    (anymore 'fens' (34) than those in the last diagram and it usually fails.)



    16 Knights have checkmated 48 Kings.

    Edit:
    So there is a puzzle. (I knew some good would come of this).
    Fill the board with White Kings.



    Place as few Black Knights on the board as possbile so that every King is mated. (attacked).
    The knack must be choosing which Kings to repalce with a Black Knight.
  10. .
    Joined
    06 Feb '10
    Moves
    6916
    21 Jan '12 01:521 edit
    I get 12 like this:



    Can it be done with less than 12?
  11. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    25429
    21 Jan '12 02:43
    I suppose an easier way to do it is get every square attackd
    by as few Knights as possible. Then the answer is 12.

    It has been sorted out.
  12. .
    Joined
    06 Feb '10
    Moves
    6916
    21 Jan '12 03:181 edit
    what is the least number of Knights needed to checkmate a King in the middle of the board?

    Edit: can it be done with less than 5? I'm guessing no given each Knight can only cover 2 squares adjacent to the King, even if they occupy another square.
  13. Joined
    26 Apr '03
    Moves
    25828
    22 Jan '12 17:361 edit
    Originally posted by andrew93
    I get 12 like this:

    [fen] KKKKKKKK/KKnKKKKK/KKnnKnnK/KKKKKnKK/KKnKKKKK/KnnKnnKK/KKKKKnKK/KKKKKKKK[/fen]

    Can it be done with less than 12?
    I don't think that is an answer


    Some kings are not mated there, because they can take knights.
  14. .
    Joined
    06 Feb '10
    Moves
    6916
    23 Jan '12 08:58
    That would depend on an interpretation of the question - I was relying on the qualifier "attacked".

    To get a solution where each and every King is check-mated (and not just attacked) I figure you need 4 more Knights.

    Can it be done with less?

    Andrew
Back to Top