Originally posted by eatmybishop
would it be better to say, as yet, nothing has travelled the speed of light.... i really dont like the use of "it's impossible to travel the speed of light"... in saying that, you are implying not ever is it possible, even in 10, 100, or a million years...
If I said something like "Perhaps we can't divide by zero today, but in the future we will be able to divide by zero", or "In the future I am sure that we will be able to print out all the decimals of pi!" people would say I'm crazy to have this opinion.
But I can say without blushing that "Someday in the future we will be start travelling!", or "Someday we will succeed with hydrogene fusion.", or Someday we will have a cure for cancer, AIDS, and Alzheimers!"
What is the difference between the two categories of statements? For one the first category of statements it is proven that it will not work. In the second category it is just a matter of time, money and will.
If we look at the statement of dividing by zero - in the equation E=mc2 you actually try to divide by zero if you put v=c. It's a fact. And therefore it will not work. You can't travel at the speed of light, it's impossible.
But, and this is interesting, if you put v>c you find yourself trying to get a square out of a negative number, it's just complex arithmetic, nothing more. Here I wont say that this is impossible. Perhaps in the future you can add an complex property to your own mass and voilà you have a superluminous velocity, and if you get rid of the imaginary property voilà you're back in normal velocities again.
I say - listen! - we know today how we can go to alpha Centauri and back in a years time! But we don't have the engine, or propellant to do it. Anyone knowing the theory of relativity knows it is possible. So star travelling is in theory already possible! And this not even necesary to go with light speed! Or worm holes, or tunneling or anything not yet known!