26 Jun '07 20:24>
Originally posted by agrysonCool, thanks π
Oh, in that case, the answer is that you look like a pancake flying through space. But at least you now know how to make space pancakes, right?
Originally posted by agrysonI shall have a go at that next time I go to the pub. Another good pub trick that can win you free drink is bet someone that the circumferance of a pint glass is longer than its height. No one will believe you, but it is! I guess you will probably know that already.
My pleasure. Pub physics is an important vocation. Did you know that if you have several dry beermats on a dry table, it is possible to stack them in such a way that the top beermat is over the edge of the table? Practice at home before you go, or be drunk, that's always a handy excuse.
Originally posted by torchmoonThink of a quick turning on and off of a laser beam. So you turn on the laser for say, one nanosecond. thats a piece of the light beam that would be about 300 MM thick. So you can simulate what you are talking about by going sublight speed, say going to the moon, then setting up a com circuit where, because there is about a 2 second delay of light going from earth to moon, then you send a signal and they respond by sending out that 1 nanosecond flash. Think about it.
Lets say you can travel faster than the speed of light. If you travelled a certain distance stopped and turned round. What would you see? Would you see yourself going away from you or coming towards you?
Originally posted by sonhouseSay you pass points A and B to reach point C. If you turn round at C wouldn't the light from B reach you first, and then the light from point A second? So wouldn't this appear as if you were travelling backwards?
Think of a quick turning on and off of a laser beam. So you turn on the laser for say, one nanosecond. thats a piece of the light beam that would be about 300 MM thick. So you can simulate what you are talking about by going sublight speed, say going to the moon, then setting up a com circuit where, because there is about a 2 second delay of light going fro ...[text shortened]... yet. 10 seconds later the light catches up to you and you see yourself or your vehicle. Capesh?
Originally posted by sonhouseIt's called the Achilles paradox.
Think of a quick turning on and off of a laser beam. So you turn on the laser for say, one nanosecond. thats a piece of the light beam that would be about 300 MM thick. So you can simulate what you are talking about by going sublight speed, say going to the moon, then setting up a com circuit where, because there is about a 2 second delay of light going fro ...[text shortened]... yet. 10 seconds later the light catches up to you and you see yourself or your vehicle. Capesh?
Originally posted by sonhouseBut when the light catches up to you, you see it coming at you all packed together hence the pancake effect. Of course, you might have to wait a while, but you would see something.
Think of a quick turning on and off of a laser beam. So you turn on the laser for say, one nanosecond. thats a piece of the light beam that would be about 300 MM thick. So you can simulate what you are talking about by going sublight speed, say going to the moon, then setting up a com circuit where, because there is about a 2 second delay of light going fro ...[text shortened]... yet. 10 seconds later the light catches up to you and you see yourself or your vehicle. Capesh?
Originally posted by EinsteinMindWell with Einsteins mind you should know better than thatπ
It's called the Achilles paradox.
A tortoise has a rocket pack strapped to its back, and Achilles lets the turtle have a 5 second headstart. Well, as long as that turtle is moving at a speed at least 90 % of Achilles speed and continues to accelerate, Achilles can spend all the time in the world trying to catch up to that turtle, but he never can be ...[text shortened]... ght (say 95 % of c), you would look behind you and see an accelerational black hole.
Originally posted by torchmoonAWWW bless aren't you just the sweetest but seriously ladies' fuzzy little brains cannot cope with physics.
I'm female not a guy (sounds of groans and oh that explains it heard), and kind of wish i never asked. I'm not big on physics as you all now know! I don't understand a word of what you all have said. It was supposed to be a fun question based on pub talk with my mates, sorry guys π³
Originally posted by adam warlockIf I could answer his question, I would be a candidate for the Nobel Prize in physics.
You could just answer the question the guy posted in the frame of reference of a tachyon then.
Originally posted by torchmoonYou would have had a good life in ancient Rome, eh! Hi, haven't had the pleasure of meeting you yet. If you are into music you could take a look at my myspace account, give a listen, donjenningsguitar.
I know, that's why I'm a microbiologist. Any time you want to know anything about food poisoning organisms, I'm your girl! π
Originally posted by FabianFnashttp://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/tachyons.html
If I could answer his question, I would be a candidate for the Nobel Prize in physics.
No one knows yet if there exist any of these ghostly particles or if they just appear in mathematical formulae. No one has yet observed them, and no one knows how to observe them if possible.
The question is Newtonian and not Einsteinian. That means that one shoul ...[text shortened]... d be treated this way. this is not the Spirituality Forum where religion is taken into account.
Originally posted by sonhouseno they haven't. To this days a lot of articles are being written. I even once a book on them on the Library of my work+lace. They are not part of my field of work but I know that a lot of bright guys and girls work on them. If you want you can go http://arxiv.org/ and look for tachyons on it and read some articles to see that they are not ruled out. Yet that is.
All well and good but I think the theory gods have ruled them out.