1. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    23 Oct '06 22:26
    Originally posted by skeeter
    The 'pressure thing' that I refer to is the only 'thing' that enables a plane to fly. That pressure is created by the differing rates of flow over the two surfaces. Air flow over the longer surface, the top, is faster so less pressure whilst the flow over the shorter is relatively slower therefore more pressure and that is what produces the lift. Nothing else does.

    skeeter
    Wrong.

    Have a look at:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_%28force%29
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_attack
    and
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airfoil

    You'll find the statement you made in the misconception section of the Lift page.
  2. Joined
    13 Oct '06
    Moves
    124
    23 Oct '06 22:41
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    Wrong.

    Have a look at:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_%28force%29
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_attack
    and
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airfoil

    You'll find the statement you made in the misconception section of the Lift page.


    I agree, you're wrong, there is more lift created over the top of the wing than there is at underneath.
  3. Argentina
    Joined
    23 May '03
    Moves
    2029
    23 Oct '06 23:03
    Originally posted by flyUnity
    A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of treadmill). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves at the same speed but in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?"

    (copied and pasted from another source)
    No. And ATY has answered correctly (see the 2nd post).
    Other answers I've read on this thread (that no agree with ATY post) only puts in evidence your poor understanding -if any- of elementary physics laws, not to speak of fluid mechanics.
  4. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    23 Oct '06 23:111 edit
    Originally posted by CrazyLilTing
    No. And ATY has answered correctly (see the 2nd post).
    Other answers I've read on this thread (that no agree with ATY post) only puts in evidence your poor understanding -if any- of elementary physics laws, not to speak of fluid mechanics.
    Planes create forward motion by pushing on the air (which is stationary) and the wheels freely rotate (they aren't driving, they could easily be replaced with skids [and are in some planes]).

    So normally a plane takes off by pushing on the air to create forward motion until it reaches a certain speed at which it takes off due to created lift.

    On a treadmill the plane pushes on the air and changes from moving backwards through the air to being stationary to it to moving forward through it. The plane is decoupled from the treadmill by the freely rotating wheels. As the plane starts to move forward the wheels will be spinning faster than the plane is moving but that isn't an issue. And so the plane again takes off when forward motion creates lift.

    EDIT: Note that ATY has admitted that his first post was wrong.
  5. Argentina
    Joined
    23 May '03
    Moves
    2029
    23 Oct '06 23:221 edit
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    Planes create forward motion by pushing on the air (which is stationary) and the wheels freely rotate (they aren't driving, they could easily be replaced with skids [and are in some planes]).

    So normally a plane takes off by pushing on the air to create forward motion until it reaches a certain speed at which it takes off due to created lift.

    On a tr orward motion creates lift.

    EDIT: Note that ATY has admitted that his first post was wrong.
    Hi Xanthos,

    I've don't read all the posts.

    But only common sense dictates that if an airplane is trying to take off while being on a conveyer that takes it at 0 velocity measured with respect to the atmosphere,- which is the case formulated in the original question (may be I have misunderstood it)- it will never take off.

    Edit: as long as the conveyer keep the airplane at velociry 0.
  6. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    23 Oct '06 23:45
    Originally posted by CrazyLilTing
    Hi Xanthos,

    I've don't read all the posts.

    But only common sense dictates that if an airplane is trying to take off while being on a conveyer that takes it at 0 velocity measured with respect to the atmosphere,- which is the case formulated in the original question (may be I have misunderstood it)- it will never take off.

    Edit: as long as the conveyer keep the airplane at velociry 0.
    How would the conveyor belt keep the plane at 0 velocity with respect to the atmosphere?
  7. Argentina
    Joined
    23 May '03
    Moves
    2029
    24 Oct '06 00:01
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    How would the conveyor belt keep the plane at 0 velocity with respect to the atmosphere?
    Easy. Imagine no wind velocity, may be only a mild breeze.
    In ideal conditions, the velocity of air being 0 measured to the conveyor.
    As far as the relative velocity of the airplane remains 0, so does the airplane (velociry) to the atmosphere.
    If that numbers aren't exact, may be the plane could take off... But I can't imagine me driving an airplane in such conitiions, when the tale off is finite (in mathematical and practical tems 🙂 )
  8. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    24 Oct '06 00:25
    Originally posted by CrazyLilTing
    Easy. Imagine no wind velocity, may be only a mild breeze.
    In ideal conditions, the velocity of air being 0 measured to the conveyor.
    As far as the relative velocity of the airplane remains 0, so does the airplane (velociry) to the atmosphere.
    If that numbers aren't exact, may be the plane could take off... But I can't imagine me driving an airplane in such conitiions, when the tale off is finite (in mathematical and practical tems 🙂 )
    You have actually made no sense at all.

    PS. Reading threads before posting in them is advised.
  9. Argentina
    Joined
    23 May '03
    Moves
    2029
    24 Oct '06 01:37
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    You have actually made no sense at all.

    PS. Reading threads before posting in them is advised.
    thanks. I'll tale ur advise into account.
    But if u think my post is nonsense, pls revise ur elementary lnowledege of Physics 101
    You are better at math, I think.
  10. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    24 Oct '06 02:30
    Originally posted by CrazyLilTing
    thanks. I'll tale ur advise into account.
    But if u think my post is nonsense, pls revise ur elementary lnowledege of Physics 101
    You are better at math, I think.
    I need to learn Physics because I can't understand your broken English?
  11. Argentina
    Joined
    23 May '03
    Moves
    2029
    24 Oct '06 03:17
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    I need to learn Physics because I can't understand your broken English?
    My "broken english" is by no way a trouble to make sense of my posts. At least for you. Go ahead, and make your point, if you have one 🙂
  12. Standard memberskeeter
    515 + 30 days
    Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Mar '03
    Moves
    38202
    24 Oct '06 03:27
    Originally posted by KingsBishop
    If you actually read my post you'll see that that is what I said. Faster air = less pressure = more lift on the top surface.

    skeeter
  13. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    24 Oct '06 03:27
    Originally posted by CrazyLilTing
    My "broken english" is by no way a trouble to make sense of my posts. At least for you. Go ahead, and make your point, if you have one 🙂
    So let's analyse your post.

    "Easy. Imagine no wind velocity, may be only a mild breeze.
    In ideal conditions, the velocity of air being 0 measured to the conveyor. "
    So there isn't any wind. Fine.

    "As far as the relative velocity of the airplane remains 0, so does the airplane (velociry) to the atmosphere."
    You can't say relative velocity without giving what it is relative to (as you did in the first phrase). It's meaningless if you do.

    "If that numbers aren't exact, may be the plane could take off... But I can't imagine me driving an airplane in such conitiions, when the tale off is finite (in mathematical and practical tems )"
    What tail-off? What are you talking about?

    So even if I assume you mean that the plane cannot gain velocity relative to the air you'd still be wrong as that isn't true.
  14. Joined
    07 Sep '05
    Moves
    35068
    24 Oct '06 13:42
    Originally posted by XanthosNZ
    Wrong.

    Have a look at:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_%28force%29
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_attack
    and
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airfoil

    You'll find the statement you made in the misconception section of the Lift page.
    None of this really contradicts the statement that it is the pressure difference that causes lift. The misconceptions are about exactly what causes that pressure difference. But there's still a pressure difference.
  15. Standard memberuzless
    The So Fist
    Voice of Reason
    Joined
    28 Mar '06
    Moves
    9908
    24 Oct '06 19:362 edits
    So, someone give a straight yes or no answer to the question!

    A plane is at point X on the runway. The runway begins to move left. The plane begins to move right at exactly the same speed as the runway. Therefore the plane is stationary at point X all the time.

    Can someone therefore explain how a plane is supposed to lift off the ground if it isn't moving?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree