Originally posted by sonhouse Struck a chord, I see. Your hero has spots. Now we know for sure where your anti climate stance comes from. You are a Singerite.
You are really desperate and still embarrassing yourself. Dr. Singer is very well respected. Do you honestly think he could have gained that status if those phobos lies were true? It defies logic! Seriously, stop embarassing yourself.
I have to admit you made me laugh really hard though....lol! 😀
Originally posted by Metal Brain You are really desperate and still embarrassing yourself. Dr. Singer is very well respected. Do you honestly think he could have gained that status if those phobos lies were true? It defies logic! Seriously, stop embarassing yourself.
I have to admit you made me laugh really hard though....lol! 😀
Here is another site that says Singer supported Shklovskii:
http://thearrowsoftruth.com/tag/mars-anomalies/
1960 is a long time ago, I doubt if there are papers available from that year.
I don't think the information contained in so many sites would be lying. It is just you who cannot accept your dude might be out in left field.
Originally posted by sonhouse Here is another site that says Singer supported Shklovskii:
http://thearrowsoftruth.com/tag/mars-anomalies/
1960 is a long time ago, I doubt if there are papers available from that year.
I don't think the information contained in so many sites would be lying. It is just you who cannot accept your dude might be out in left field.
Well, here he is in FINE company: Rush Limbaugh
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-127787073.html
Read this article so you realize how much people lie about Dr. Singer. You could come up with a dozen wacko websites nobody has heard of and it would make no difference. You are just desperate because your world is crumbling. Suck it up and get over it!
Originally posted by Metal Brain Read this article so you realize how much people lie about Dr. Singer. You could come up with a dozen wacko websites nobody has heard of and it would make no difference. You are just desperate because your world is crumbling. Suck it up and get over it!
Originally posted by KazetNagorra Have you sent him any love letters yet?
Like humy I see you gave up on the facts and have regressed to stupid comments since that is all you both have. Are you going to resort to slanderous weblinks nobody has heard of like sonhouse and gfudge too? 🙄
Originally posted by Metal Brain Like humy I see you gave up on the facts and have regressed to stupid comments since that is all you both have. Are you going to resort to slanderous weblinks nobody has heard of like sonhouse and gfudge too? 🙄
And of course those sites just HAVE to be 100% wrong. Why don't you email your hero and find out for yourself?
Originally posted by sonhouse And of course those sites just HAVE to be 100% wrong. Why don't you email your hero and find out for yourself?
No need to verify it is a lie, it is just common sense. Dr. Singer isn't stupid enough to sabotage his own career to please a bunch of wackos. If you had read that link I provided you would see that one lie leads to others repeating the same lie because they just accepted it like idiots. You are doing the same thing. He even mentions some of the lies on that wikipedia page to set the record straight. Were you to lazy to read the Singer interview on that link I posted several times on this thread? I think you were. You would not be continuing to make yourself look foolish if you had.
Back to the subject. There is no consensus according to respected climate scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer. All attempts to slander him with lies has failed.
Originally posted by Metal Brain No need to verify it is a lie, it is just common sense. Dr. Singer isn't stupid enough to sabotage his own career to please a bunch of wackos. If you had read that link I provided you would see that one lie leads to others repeating the same lie because they just accepted it like idiots. You are doing the same thing. He even mentions some of the lies on ...[text shortened]... thread? I think you were. You would not be continuing to make yourself look foolish if you had.
Common sense? Even Carl Sagan supported the phobos nonsense, thinking it was an artificial satellite. If it was artificial, it went through a war🙂 You don't accept Singer could have supported such a claim and you refuse to believe such. That is your problem not ours.
I read your article and there may even be a shred of truth in it, but there was nothing in that piece that even hinted at the Phobos hypothesis.
Originally posted by Metal Brain Back to the subject. There is no consensus according to respected climate scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer. All attempts to slander him with lies has failed.
Originally posted by sonhouse Common sense? Even Carl Sagan supported the phobos nonsense, thinking it was an artificial satellite. If it was artificial, it went through a war🙂 You don't accept Singer could have supported such a claim and you refuse to believe such. That is your problem not ours.
I read your article and there may even be a shred of truth in it, but there was nothing in that piece that even hinted at the Phobos hypothesis.
"Even Carl Sagan supported the phobos nonsense"
Bullcrap! What is your source of information, wikipedia again?
0.5% of climate scientists, not 97%
12 Jul '15 20:18
Back to Top