Originally posted by Metal Brain What is the consensus? What was the question that the consensus was based on? More importantly, what is your source of information, wikipedia again?
See for example Doran and Zimmerman, EOS 90, 22-23 (2009).
Originally posted by KazetNagorra See for example Doran and Zimmerman, EOS 90, 22-23 (2009).
LOL! So the consensus is what I have been saying all along. Man is merely a factor and nothing more. Once again all you have established is that Dr. Singer was right all along. There is no consensus that man is the primary factor. Try again.
Originally posted by Metal Brain LOL! So the consensus is what I have been saying all along. Man is merely a factor and nothing more. Once again all you have established is that Dr. Singer was right all along. There is no consensus that man is the primary factor. Try again.
Considering the depth of the hole you have been digging for yourself I'm not surprised you don't notice the effect of global warming.
Originally posted by KazetNagorra Considering the depth of the hole you have been digging for yourself I'm not surprised you don't notice the effect of global warming.
I think I'm doing very well. You are the one digging yourself a hole. You claimed a consensus that did not exist. All you did was verify Dr. Singer's claim of no consensus.
I didn't look into anything but the consensus issue. That is what this thread is about, not the effects. I have addressed the effects before and debunked many myths regarding that already. If you want to dig up those old bones I'll debunk them again if you want to create another thread about it though. The coral reefs are fine and the ocean is not acidic at all. The polar bear population is increasing and the ocean levels are not rising at an alarming rate at all. You have been brainwashed by biased junk just like the other alarmists on here. Facts don't matter to you though. You have made that clear. Take a reality pill!
Back to the subject. There is no consensus according to respected climate scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer. All attempts to slander him with lies has failed.
Originally posted by Metal Brain Back to the subject. There is no consensus according to respected climate scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer. All attempts to slander him with lies has failed.
Originally posted by KazetNagorra Actually, it does.
No, I googled it and it clearly does not. You neglected to look at what the consensus was. It only said man was an influence, NOT the primary factor. Learn to read!
Originally posted by sonhouse The fact he supported a UFO nutter, along with Carl Sagan, is not a lie. It was published in too many places. He has never repudiated that support.
14 Jul '15 15:28
0.5% of climate scientists, not 97%
Back to Top