Originally posted by @sonhouse http://www.sciencealert.com/nightmarish-500-page-math-proof-even-experts-can-t-understand-about-published-shinichi-mochizuki
This paper has been analysed for years with no consenous.
I wonder if Terence Tao has had a look?
Perhaps it's a proof, perhaps it's not. If nobody understands it, then that certainly doesn't mean it's truly a brilliant proof. It might be one big pile of crap.
Originally posted by @soothfast Perhaps it's a proof, perhaps it's not. If nobody understands it, then that certainly doesn't mean it's truly a brilliant proof. It might be one big pile of crap.
A 500 page pile of crap in that case. I wonder why math dudes haven't had the originator go over it bit by bit so they can understand? It sounds like he does the paper, takes ten years or whatever, give a single seminar, and ship it to the world and go back to scratching on a blackboard leaving the rest of the math community scratching their heads in frustration.
Originally posted by @soothfast Perhaps it's a proof, perhaps it's not. If nobody understands it, then that certainly doesn't mean it's truly a brilliant proof. It might be one big pile of crap.
I liked this quote from someone called Voloch referenced in the article linked to in the OP:
"At the afternoon tea break, everybody was confused. I asked many people and nobody had a clue."
I in no way accused you of lying. Sometimes a question is just a question because the person issuing it does not know. What would I gain by causing that kind of trouble?
But what you don't know is how to conduct a civil conversation without continually blowing
your own horn and insulting everyone around you. If there's a troll around here, it's you.