Originally posted by sonhouse Well we CAN know by intelligent inference about the mutation rates of DNA and can project it all back in time. The fact you refuse to accept that just goes to show how much you have been deluded by your ponzi scheme intelligent design religion.
Your problem is that you are trying to go the wrong way. We must go forward in time.
Originally posted by RJHinds Your problem is that you are trying to go the wrong way. We must go forward in time.
The Instructor
You who desperately want to be back in the year 1000? Going forward in TIME? What is that going to get you but becoming further and further back in the fringe where everyone else KNOWS Earth is 4.5 billion years old and creationism is a tale told to weak minds which you bought hook line and sinker. You CLEARLY don't want to go FORWARD in time, that direction of time leads to the death of creationism as a movement.
Originally posted by sonhouse You who desperately want to be back in the year 1000? Going forward in TIME? What is that going to get you but becoming further and further back in the fringe where everyone else KNOWS Earth is 4.5 billion years old and creationism is a tale told to weak minds which you bought hook line and sinker. You CLEARLY don't want to go FORWARD in time, that direction of time leads to the death of creationism as a movement.
As time moves on we are seeing more and more evidence against evilution. So much evidence has been revealed that many evilutionists have abandoned their faith in it. We are hearing more and more about the collapse and death of evolution as more scientific knowledge is gained in biology and especially in microbiology with the discovery of the complexity of the cell. Now even microevolution is being challenged.
Originally posted by RJHinds As time moves on we are seeing more and more evidence against evilution. So much evidence has been revealed that many evilutionists have abandoned their faith in it. We are hearing more and more about the collapse and death of evolution as more scientific knowledge is gained in biology and especially in microbiology with the discovery of the complexity of the cell. Now even microevolution is being challenged.
The Instructor
Sure, challenged by idiots on youtube with little or no academic creds. Make no mistake about it, that is not even CLOSE to being actual science. You and your buddies have to do better than a bunch of freak show you tube snow jobs aimed only at changing political positions and having NOTHING to do with actual science.
Originally posted by sonhouse Sure, challenged by idiots on youtube with little or no academic creds. Make no mistake about it, that is not even CLOSE to being actual science. You and your buddies have to do better than a bunch of freak show you tube snow jobs aimed only at changing political positions and having NOTHING to do with actual science.
I have referenced some coming from many that have high academic credentials, such as PHDs.
Originally posted by humy -from a discredited minute minority. Try again.
You would consider anyone that does not believe in evilution as discredited, because you believe evilution is proven scientific fact. However, evilution is unproven and many evilutionary scientists has been discredited as putting forth false evidence in an attempt to prove this false assumption called a theory by the ignorant. I call it a lie and it is nothing more than a false hypothesis at best.
Originally posted by RJHinds You would consider anyone that does not believe in evilution as discredited, because you believe evilution is proven scientific fact. However, evilution is unproven and many evilutionary scientists has been discredited as putting forth false evidence in an attempt to prove this false assumption called a theory by the ignorant. I call it a lie and it is nothing more than a false hypothesis at best.
The Instructor
False evidence? Whatever you are talking about, your creationist buddies have done a thousand times over. That all they HAVE is false evidence, misdirection and video's just making statements that a 14 year old first biology student can refute. You and your buddies have absolutely NOTHING to disprove evolution, only your 'god didit' bullshyte.
Originally posted by sonhouse False evidence? Whatever you are talking about, your creationist buddies have done a thousand times over. That all they HAVE is false evidence, misdirection and video's just making statements that a 14 year old first biology student can refute. You and your buddies have absolutely NOTHING to disprove evolution, only your 'god didit' bullshyte.
It seems that you get more unreasonable every day. I feel sorry for you.
Originally posted by RJHinds It seems that you get more unreasonable every day. I feel sorry for you.
The Instructor
Yeah, it's really unreasonable not to be taken in by the creationist claiming to be doing science, when all the while the real agenda is to destroy evolution. I tell you once more, that is not science, that is religious politics. Nothing more.
Originally posted by sonhouse Yeah, it's really unreasonable not to be taken in by the creationist claiming to be doing science, when all the while the real agenda is to destroy evolution. I tell you once more, that is not science, that is religious politics. Nothing more.
I think it is possible to have an agenda to destroy evolution and still do real science. There is obviously a bias on both sides of the issue.
Originally posted by RJHinds I think it is possible to have an agenda to destroy evolution and still do real science. There is obviously a bias on both sides of the issue.
The Instructor
The problem is you have NOTHING but bias. ANYTHING you can throw at the world that has any slight resemblance to science, no matter how bogus, your buddies put out there, not in a science journal but on you tube which of course means it is just another political gesture having nothing to do with actual science or learning the truth about the world but to put out your POV on the fairy tale of creationism. Like I have said before, weaponized pseudoscience.
Originally posted by sonhouse The problem is you have NOTHING but bias. ANYTHING you can throw at the world that has any slight resemblance to science, no matter how bogus, your buddies put out there, not in a science journal but on you tube which of course means it is just another political gesture having nothing to do with actual science or learning the truth about the world but to pu ...[text shortened]... ut your POV on the fairy tale of creationism. Like I have said before, weaponized pseudoscience.
It matters little whether you are convinced or not. The real issue is how the cancer of creationism creeps into real science classrooms and the political movement it represents.
23 Sep '13 18:44
A piece of the puzzle of how life started:
Back to Top