15 Sep '13 21:26>
http://phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-cosmic-factory-blocks-life.html
Originally posted by RJHindsThere you go again with your 'after winning the war on evolution' agenda, being the science censor. I sincerely hope that NEVER happens and you and you ilk just grouse about it in a vast minority.
I don't see no puzzle piece about the forming of life. I think it is just more hype over nothing in an effort to get more research dollars.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseThere is no censor of science with me. Just make sure that it is science and not mere opinion or else you may see my opinion also.
There you go again with your 'after winning the war on evolution' agenda, being the science censor. I sincerely hope that NEVER happens and you and you ilk just grouse about it in a vast minority.
Originally posted by RJHinds
There is no censor of science with me. Just make sure that it is science and not mere opinion or else you may see my opinion also.
The Instructor
Just make sure that it is science and not mere opinion
Originally posted by humyThe following statement from the article is mere opinion, not proven science:Just make sure that it is science and not mere opinion
what you keep say is “mere opinion” IS science and proven scientific facts.
For example, evolution is proven scientific fact and not "mere opinion".
Originally posted by RJHindsWe continue to have this conversation about evolution vs life origin. They are two separate species in science. Get it? ORIGIN\= (does not equal) evolution.
The following statement from the article is mere opinion, not proven science:
"The researchers [b]suggest that this process provides another piece to the puzzle of how life was kick-started on Earth, after a period of time between 4.5 and 3.8 billion years ago when the planet had been bombarded by comets and meteorites."
The Instructor[/b]
Originally posted by RJHindswhat does whether that is a proven fact got to do with evolution being a proven fact?
The following statement from the article is mere opinion, not proven science:
"The researchers [b]suggest that this process provides another piece to the puzzle of how life was kick-started on Earth, after a period of time between 4.5 and 3.8 billion years ago when the planet had been bombarded by comets and meteorites."
The Instructor[/b]
Originally posted by sonhouseYou are not thinking again. There must be an accounting for biological life before there can be any biological evilution. So they are logically tied together. You didn't think about that, did you? Another example of your problem caused by the lack of thinking on the right things.
We continue to have this conversation about evolution vs life origin. They are two separate species in science. Get it? ORIGIN\= (does not equal) evolution.
Of course you will just continue to deny deny deny My thumbs are in my ears, I refuse to hear you Nya Nya Nya.
Originally posted by humyObviously, if you did not have a problem of right thinking, then you would realize that evilution is based on suggestions and opinions that are not proven facts; so it logically follows that evilution is not a proven fact either. You never thought of that either, right?
what does whether that is a proven fact got to do with evolution being a proven fact?
Originally posted by RJHindsIt's funny, the rest of the world thinks evolution is a separate science from life origin studies. But just because we can't figure out exactly how life started doesn't mean we can't study evolution and see what answers it gives in terms of understanding the life forms we see all around us.
You are not thinking again. There must be an accounting for biological life before there can be any biological evilution. So they are logically tied together. You didn't think about that, did you? Another example of your problem caused by the lack of thinking on the right things.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseInstead of wasting time on the study of the stupid theory of evilution, why not put all the effort in studying real biology and real science? Then we could all get along much better.
It's funny, the rest of the world thinks evolution is a separate science from life origin studies. But just because we can't figure out exactly how life started doesn't mean we can't study evolution and see what answers it gives in terms of understanding the life forms we see all around us.
We don't need a bible for that, we can study it for ourselves w ...[text shortened]... point.
I'll believe the real scientists and not you, EVER, thank you very much.
NOT.
Originally posted by RJHindsAh, you mean just ignoring the implications of evolutionary biology. Well one of the things that evolution just taught us is humans picked up a useful immune system mutation about 200,000 years ago that made us a lot more resistant to bacteria, viruses and parasites in nature that let us have lifespans twice as long as monkeys, chimps and so forth.
Instead of wasting time on the study of the stupid theory of evilution, why not put all the effort in studying real biology and real science? Then we could all get along much better.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseThere is no way that evilution can know what happened 200,000 years ago. Can't you see that that is just a made-up number? Evilution is a liar.
Ah, you mean just ignoring the implications of evolutionary biology. Well one of the things that evolution just taught us is humans picked up a useful immune system mutation about 200,000 years ago that made us a lot more resistant to bacteria, viruses and parasites in nature that let us have lifespans twice as long as monkeys, chimps and so forth.
We ha ...[text shortened]... nge. You should have a talk with Art bell, he would love to have you on his internet radio show.
Originally posted by RJHindsWell we CAN know by intelligent inference about the mutation rates of DNA and can project it all back in time. The fact you refuse to accept that just goes to show how much you have been deluded by your ponzi scheme intelligent design religion.
There is no way that evilution can know what happened 200,000 years ago. Can't you see that that is just a made-up number? Evilution is a liar.
The Instructor