Originally posted by ogbIn physics and mathematics, one can and does use any number of dimensions depending on the problem at hand, including zero, one, any finite number, infinite and fractional.
How can scientists prove more than 4 dimensions?
You're probably referring to string theory. While I'm not an expert on the topic, as far as I understand many variations of string theory require more than 4 physical dimensions. You would show that these theories are correct by empirically verifying their predictions. In the case of string theory, this is extremely hard, which is why few people are working on the topic.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraHere is a book I read:
In physics and mathematics, one can and does use any number of dimensions depending on the problem at hand, including zero, one, any finite number, infinite and fractional.
You're probably referring to string theory. While I'm not an expert on the topic, as far as I understand many variations of string theory require more than 4 physical dimensions. ...[text shortened]... case of string theory, this is extremely hard, which is why few people are working on the topic.
The Trouble with Physics, by Lee Smolin:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trouble_with_Physics
This Wiki gives a 50 cent tour of the book. He hates string theory, bottom line🙂
And another physicist chimes in: Peter Woit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Woit
Woit and Smolin both object to string theory on the grounds it has yet to make a single prediction that can be tested by any kind of technology in the foreseeable future.