Astronomers Find First Habitable Earth-like Planet
Artist's impression of the system of three planets surrounding the red dwarf Gliese 581. One of them is the first rocky planet lying in the habitable zone to have been discovered. (Credit: ESO)
ScienceDaily (Apr. 24, 2007) — Astronomers have discovered the most Earth-like planet outside our Solar System to date, an exoplanet with a radius only 50% larger than the Earth and capable of having liquid water. Using the ESO 3.6-m telescope, a team of Swiss, French and Portuguese scientists discovered a super-Earth about 5 times the mass of the Earth that orbits a red dwarf, already known to harbour a Neptune-mass planet. The astronomers have also strong evidence for the presence of a third planet with a mass about 8 Earth masses.
This exoplanet - as astronomers call planets around a star other than the Sun -- is the smallest ever found up to now [1] and it completes a full orbit in 13 days. It is 14 times closer to its star than the Earth is from the Sun. However, given that its host star, the red dwarf Gliese 581 [2], is smaller and colder than the Sun -- and thus less luminous -- the planet nevertheless lies in the habitable zone, the region around a star where water could be liquid!
"We have estimated that the mean temperature of this super-Earth lies between 0 and 40 degrees Celsius, and water would thus be liquid," explains Stéphane Udry, from the Geneva Observatory (Switzerland) and lead-author of the paper reporting the result. "Moreover, its radius should be only 1.5 times the Earth's radius, and models predict that the planet should be either rocky -- like our Earth -- or covered with oceans," he adds.
"Liquid water is critical to life as we know it," avows Xavier Delfosse, a member of the team from Grenoble University (France). "Because of its temperature and relative proximity, this planet will most probably be a very important target of the future space missions dedicated to the search for extra-terrestrial life. On the treasure map of the Universe, one would be tempted to mark this planet with an X."
The host star, Gliese 581, is among the 100 closest stars to us, located only 20.5 light-years away in the constellation Libra ("the Scales" ). It has a mass of only one third the mass of the Sun. Such red dwarfs are intrinsically at least 50 times fainter than the Sun and are the most common stars in our Galaxy: among the 100 closest stars to the Sun, 80 belong to this class.
"Red dwarfs are ideal targets for the search for low-mass planets where water could be liquid. Because such dwarfs emit less light, the habitable zone is much closer to them than it is around the Sun," emphasizes Xavier Bonfils, a co-worker from Lisbon University. Planets lying in this zone are then more easily detected with the radial-velocity method [3], the most successful in detecting exoplanets.
Two years ago, the same team of astronomers already found a planet around Gliese 581 (see ESO 30/05). With a mass of 15 Earth-masses, i.e. similar to that of Neptune, it orbits its host star in 5.4 days. At the time, the astronomers had already seen hints of another planet. They therefore obtained a new set of measurements and found the new super-Earth, but also clear indications for another one, an 8 Earth-mass planet completing an orbit in 84 days. The planetary system surrounding Gliese 581 contains thus no fewer than 3 planets of 15 Earth masses or less, and as such is a quite remarkable system.
The discovery was made thanks to HARPS (High Accuracy Radial Velocity for Planetary Searcher), perhaps the most precise spectrograph in the world. Located on the ESO 3.6-m telescope at La Silla, Chile, HARPS is able to measure velocities with a precision better than one metre per second (or 3.6 km/h)! HARPS is one of the most successful instruments for detecting exoplanets and holds already several recent records, including the discovery of another 'Trio of Neptunes' (ESO 18/06, see also ESO 22/04).
The detected velocity variations are between 2 and 3 metres per second, corresponding to about 9 km/h! That's the speed of a person walking briskly. Such tiny signals could not have been distinguished from 'simple noise' by most of today's available spectrographs.
"HARPS is a unique planet hunting machine," says Michel Mayor, from Geneva Observatory, and HARPS Principal Investigator. "Given the incredible precision of HARPS, we have focused our effort on low-mass planets. And we can say without doubt that HARPS has been very successful: out of the 13 known planets with a mass below 20 Earth masses, 11 were discovered with HARPS!"
HARPS is also very efficient in finding planetary systems, where tiny signals have to be uncovered. The two systems known to have three low mass planets -- HD 69830 and Gl 581 -- were discovered by HARPS.
"And we are confident that, given the results obtained so far, finding a planet with the mass of the Earth around a red dwarf is within reach," affirms Mayor.
This research is reported in a paper submitted as a Letter to the Editor of Astronomy and Astrophysics ("The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets : XI. An habitable super-Earth (5 MEarth) in a 3-planet system", by S. Udry et al.)
The team is composed of Stéphane Udry, Michel Mayor, Christophe Lovis, Francesco Pepe, and Didier Queloz (Geneva Observatory, Switzerland), Xavier Bonfils (Lisbonne Observatory, Portugal), Xavier Delfosse, Thierry Forveille, and C.Perrier (LAOG, Grenoble, France), François Bouchy (Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, France), and Jean-Luc Bertaux (Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS, France)
Notes
[1] Using the radial velocity method, astronomers can only obtain a minimum mass (as it is multiplied by the sine of the inclination of the orbital plane to the line of sight, which is unknown). From a statistical point of view, this is however often close to the real mass of the system. Two other systems have a mass close to this. The icy planet around OGLE-05-390L, discovered by microlensing with a network of telescopes including one at La Silla (ESO 03/06), has a (real) mass of 5.7 Earth masses. It, however, orbits much farther from its small host star than the present one and is hence much colder. The other is one of the planets surrounding the star Gliese 876. It has a minimum mass of 5.89 Earth masses (and a probable real mass of 7.53 Earth masses) and completes an orbit in less than 2 days, making it too hot for liquid water to be present.
[2] Gl 581, or Gliese 581, is the 581th entry in the Gliese Catalogue, which lists all known stars within 25 parsecs (81.5 light years) of the Sun. It was originally compiled by Gliese and published in 1969, and later updated by Gliese and Jahreiss in 1991.
[3] This fundamental observational method is based on the detection of variations in the velocity of the central star, due to the changing direction of the gravitational pull from an (unseen) exoplanet as it orbits the star. The evaluation of the measured velocity variations allows deducing the planet's orbit, in particular the period and the distance from the star, as well as a minimum mass.
European Southern Observatory (2007, April 24). Astronomers Find First Habitable Earth-like Planet. ScienceDaily. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070424204528.htm#
Wow. Quite interesting. Too bad those planets are that far away.
I wonder are any ecosystems on them. For example - the first planet mentioned. Do you know is there any data about the age of that planet? Has enough time passed for intelligent life forms to evolve?
Another thing that bothers me is gravity. Even if they're only a few times heavier than Earth, the free fall acceleration will be strongly affected I think. Unfortunately I don't remember the formula to calculate it. I think it involved mass and gravitational constant.
Originally posted by kbaumen50% bigger in mass, doesn't that imply 50% larger gravitation? Like for a 60 kg guy weighing 90 kg. I think after a while you can get used to it.
Wow. Quite interesting. Too bad those planets are that far away.
I wonder are any ecosystems on them. For example - the first planet mentioned. Do you know is there any data about the age of that planet? Has enough time passed for intelligent life forms to evolve?
Another thing that bothers me is gravity. Even if they're only a few times heavier than ...[text shortened]... n't remember the formula to calculate it. I think it involved mass and gravitational constant.
Originally posted by FabianFnasIt said 50% larger, doesn't imply 50% more massive... Although it would be very surprising it it didn't have an almost Identical bulk composition to us, and this the same mass to volume ratio......
50% bigger in mass, doesn't that imply 50% larger gravitation? Like for a 60 kg guy weighing 90 kg. I think after a while you can get used to it.
This may sound crazy but has anyone else ever considered the idea of having inter-planet sports matches in the future when space travel is possible? "Humans vs Aliens"
Going by that report i don't think we would be any match for whatever creatures live on other planets as the intense gravity would be sure to make them much stronger. If they were to host a match our players would be crushed!
Originally posted by Kiwi kidExcept maybe in chess. But you are right if we talk about rugby.
This may sound crazy but has anyone else ever considered the idea of having inter-planet sports matches in the future when space travel is possible? "Humans vs Aliens"
Going by that report i don't think we would be any match for whatever creatures live on other planets as the intense gravity would be sure to make them much stronger. If they were to host a match our players would be crushed!
Originally posted by MexicoIt says larger: "an exoplanet with a radius only 50% larger than the Earth", but this size is (?) determined by the gravitational effect it has by its central star. Gravitational effect means here how massive the planet is. Note[3] says some of this.
It said 50% larger, doesn't imply 50% more massive... Although it would be very surprising it it didn't have an almost Identical bulk composition to us, and this the same mass to volume ratio......
I don't think there is a way to know it's radius if it is so small as only 50% larger than the Earth, if not an identical dencity is assumed.
But what do I know, a mere Earthling...😞
Originally posted by FabianFnasAhhhh, my apologies I didn't see that. Actually I was wondering how they measured the radius......
It says larger: "an exoplanet with a radius only 50% larger than the Earth", but this size is (?) determined by the gravitational effect it has by its central star. Gravitational effect means here how massive the planet is. Note[3] says some of this.
I don't think there is a way to know it's radius if it is so small as only 50% larger than the Earth, if not an identical dencity is assumed.
But what do I know, a mere Earthling...😞
This means they're assuming the same bulk composition.... Which is ok I guess, it's very likely anyway.
What do you think the probability difference is of them getting hit by a meteor.... It has to be a bit bigger than ours.... Probably not significant thou?