Atomic clock 30 seconds off in 20 billion years!:

Atomic clock 30 seconds off in 20 billion years!:

Science

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
09 Mar 12

http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-pendulum-ytterbium-clock.html

The old way, which I am familiar with because of my time at Goddard Space Flight Center on the Apollo Timing and tracking system, cesium beam and rubidium beam atomic clocks, now they are going way beyond the microwave signals these atomic beams generate and now are at optical frequencies, at the time of Apollo, the best clock was the hydrogen beam clock, accurate to one second in 6 million years, so this one is three thousand times more accurate than that. The hydrogen clock was about a thousand times more accurate than the cesium beam clocks (made by Hewlett Packard) we used to use.

Time marches on!

It means we can perform experiments about gravity, spacetime, and fundamental constants of science with much more certainty now.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-pendulum-ytterbium-clock.html

The old way, which I am familiar with because of my time at Goddard Space Flight Center on the Apollo Timing and tracking system, cesium beam and rubidium beam atomic clocks, now they are going way beyond the microwave signals these atomic beams generate and now are at optical frequencies, ...[text shortened]... nts about gravity, spacetime, and fundamental constants of science with much more certainty now.
Yes, one day everybody will agree on the truth. HalleluYah !!!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, one day everybody will agree on the truth. HalleluYah !!!
Ah, so you finally admit the universe is billions of years old. About time.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by sonhouse
Ah, so you finally admit the universe is billions of years old. About time.
There is nothing in your reference about a billion year old universe. This article
is about scientist trying to make an accurate clock. One day we will know how
and we will all know the truth. Isn't God an awesome Creator? HalleluYah!!!

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by sonhouse
It means we can perform experiments about gravity, spacetime, and fundamental constants of science with much more certainty now.
Just make sure you plug it all in correctly, or you might measure nutrinos going faster than light 🙂

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/02/faster-than-light-neutrino-result-apparently-a-mistake-due-to-loose-cable.ars

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
10 Mar 12
2 edits

Originally posted by twhitehead
Just make sure you plug it all in correctly, or you might measure nutrinos going faster than light 🙂

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/02/faster-than-light-neutrino-result-apparently-a-mistake-due-to-loose-cable.ars
Too many mistakes for scientists.

P.S. They had to admit to a mistake in dating the Shroud of Turin, too.

http://www.factsplusfacts.com/

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Too many mistakes for scientists.
Everyone makes mistakes, scientists included. The beauty of science however is that it is a process designed to discover and correct mistakes.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by twhitehead
Everyone makes mistakes, scientists included. The beauty of science however is that it is a process designed to discover and correct mistakes.
That is true. I just wish every one would take care to use the process correctly
so they would not make the mistakes to start with. It can cause animosity
when that happens.

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by twhitehead
Just make sure you plug it all in correctly, or you might measure nutrinos going faster than light 🙂

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/02/faster-than-light-neutrino-result-apparently-a-mistake-due-to-loose-cable.ars
It's actually far more complicated and subtle than a 'lose cable'.

http://profmattstrassler.com/2012/02/27/why-the-curtain-has-not-fallen-on-opera/

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
That is true. I just wish every one would take care to use the process correctly
so they would not make the mistakes to start with. It can cause animosity
when that happens.
Get out of science you religious whackjob.

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
That is true. I just wish every one would take care to use the process correctly
so they would not make the mistakes to start with. It can cause animosity
when that happens.
It is impossible to avoid mistakes. Your wishing otherwise won't change that.
Science deals with this problem by having a process that corrects mistakes.

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
10 Mar 12

Originally posted by googlefudge
It's actually far more complicated and subtle than a 'lose cable'.
I'm sure it is, but my point was that having a super accurate atomic clock is not enough if you read it wrong.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
11 Mar 12

Originally posted by googlefudge
Get out of science you religious whackjob.
I have things to say about science too. I am not a one trick pony.

V

Windsor, Ontario

Joined
10 Jun 11
Moves
3829
11 Mar 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have things to say about science too. I am not a one trick pony.
you're a no trick pony.

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
386341
11 Mar 12

If you simply must respond to the nutter, please don't quote him. I've got him obliterated and quoting him reveals the content. 🙁