Originally posted by Nemesio
How dense can we humans make an object? I mean, if we put an object in a diamond vise or
something and squeeze it really tight and give it nowhere to go but 'in,' can we start to make
objects with extremely high densities? Are those object stable, or upon release, do those objects
expand to less dense structures?
On a similar note, how much mass woul ...[text shortened]... size of a marble have? What would
the radius of its light-absorbing capacity be?
Nemesio
I'll try to answer parts of the
"How dense can we humans make an object? I mean, if we put an object in a diamond vise or something and squeeze it really tight and give it nowhere to go but 'in,' can we start to make objects with extremely high densities? Are those object stable, or upon release, do those objects expand to less dense structures?" paragraph...
If you press a big chunk of coal to more and more extreem pressure you get a diamond, alright. We all agree to this. (My question is, what will happen with the equipment, part of this has to experience pressure as big as the diamod too, wouldn't it?) When we release the pressure, the diamond will stay stable. We know that, it has been done.
What happen if we go further: We give the chunk of fomer coal a bit more preassure. (We don't have the technology, but we, for the sake of discussion, pretend we have.) The atoms will go tighter and tighter. If the atom structure doesn't find a way to restructure itself (*), then we have an atomic counterforce. When we release the pressure, the chunk of matter will return to its previous stabel form, it will not continue in it's pressured state (if it's not stable as (*)).
Suppose you press it hard enough to form a bit of a neutron star matter, neutronium. Neutronium is a kind of matter where the atoms is so close to eachother so they are infact touching eachother. When an electron touches a proton, they combine into a neutron. So infact the whole chunk becomes neutrons and only neutrons. I guess is that neutronium is not stable under atmospheric preasure and normal temperature.
If we now press further, then the neutrons glides into eachother, and after certain limit, the quarks will blend into eachother so the neutron loses its individuality. Now we have a soup of quarks. My guess this is not stable either.
If we press further everything will be like a black hole. Not even this is stable. Release the preassure and everything will explode in order to be normal matter again. In this case a BigBang-like decompression that forms now Hydrogen atoms.
So, my guess is that man-pressured matter will not be stable, but in space neutronstars and black holes are stabel. Why?
The answer is gravitation. In the gravitational field from the object itself, its preassure will retain. But what will happen if gravitation suddenly stops? Then neutron stars will explode, black holes will explode, stars will explode and die, what about solid big things, like solid planets? (I don't know.) (Btw: The earth is not solid, so it will certanly fly away in parts due to centrifugal forces.)
But of course, gravitation is stable, will not stop, therefore neutron stars, and black holes, etc, are stable.
What about the black holes they are pruducing in CERN? They are not stable, because there are not gravitation enough to hold it together.
Now, much of the above is guessings of me. I might be wrong here and there. So you are allowed to give alternate explanations if you like.