176d
@metal-brain saidI think you are lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
I found the info from another website. You seem eager to accept cookies after a website so rudely prevents you from reading until you accept. If more people refused to accept nobody would try to coerce people into accepting cookies like that. You are part of the problem.
Why did you even bother posting that website. It is the equivalent of replying to "shadows cannot b ...[text shortened]... can".
No they can't.....yes they can....no they can't....yes they can.
You really showed me. 😴
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
176d
@divegeester
Why didn't you just say "yes they can"?
Not to that degree. Even in the example I saw from a different website (that doesn't impose cookies to read it) the angle from their example on earth was less than the angle in the moon photo. Furthermore, they cherry picked photos for a lesser angle for their comparison with only one photo. Why not 3 or more photos?
Show the angles of shadows for all photos with mismatched shadows on the moon.
@metal-brain saidI think you are lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
@divegeester
Why didn't you just say "yes they can"?
Not to that degree. Even in the example I saw from a different website (that doesn't impose cookies to read it) the angle from their example on earth was less than the angle in the moon photo. Furthermore, they cherry picked photos for a lesser angle for their comparison with only one photo. Why not 3 or more photos?
Show the angles of shadows for all photos with mismatched shadows on the moon.
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
175d
@divegeester saidAre you claiming the website you posted did not deny me the ability to read the article unless I accepted cookies? Yes or no?
I think you are lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
@metal-brain saidNo, I think you are lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
Are you claiming the website you posted did not deny me the ability to read the article unless I accepted cookies? Yes or no?
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
174d
@divegeester saidNo? Okay, then stop posting websites that demand you accept cookies. If you want your computer cluttered with cookies fine, but don't expect others to bog down their computer so it is slower than a snail.
No, I think you are lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
Once again, I found another website not so invasive. The debate is over. You think one cherry picked photo proves everything. Would you like to go over every photo one by one so you can explain every angle? We can do that, but only if you accept a bet. Are you confident enough to accept a bet?
@metal-brain saidNo photos were cherry picked, you wouldn’t know anyway.
No? Okay, then stop posting websites that demand you accept cookies. If you want your computer cluttered with cookies fine, but don't expect others to bog down their computer so it is slower than a snail.
Once again, I found another website not so invasive. The debate is over. You think one cherry picked photo proves everything. Would you like to go over every photo o ...[text shortened]... every angle? We can do that, but only if you accept a bet. Are you confident enough to accept a bet?
No, I think what is going on here is you lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
173d
@divegeester saidThere are far more than 1 photo with shadow in different directions. That is how I know 1 photo is a cherry picked photo. Your inability to answer very simple and reasonable questions is why you keep beating on the cookies like a dead horse. You want to digress into that to avoid admitting you have no answers. It is obvious.
No photos were cherry picked, you wouldn’t know anyway.
No, I think what is going on here is you lying about your fear of cookies in order to dodge legitimate evidence on non parallel shadows presented to you in the IMAGES on that site.
It amuses me to toy with your intellectual dishonesty.
@metal-brain saidYes because it’s a naturally occurring phenomenon.
There are far more than 1 photo with shadow in different directions.
Thank you for concurring and surrendering your position.
@divegeester
Thanks for lying in a way that is obvious for all to see which destroys you credibility.
I'm done with you. It was fun though. 😉
@metal-brain saidRight lol.
@divegeester
Thanks for lying in a way that is obvious for all to see which destroys you credibility.
I'm done with you. It was fun though. 😉
Back in your cave with you then, tinfoil hat on, head down ears back on your fav non-cookie conspiracy websites.
173d
@divegeester said😴
Right lol.
Back in your cave with you then, tinfoil hat on, head down ears back on your fav non-cookie conspiracy websites.
169d
@divegeester
Since you don't mind cookies here you go. Have you heard of brain transparency?
Are you ready for it?
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/ready-for-brain-transparency/
168d
@metal-brain saidIf that site has got cookies, then how did you get the link?
@divegeester
Since you don't mind cookies here you go. Have you heard of brain transparency?
Are you ready for it?
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/ready-for-brain-transparency/
Seeing as how you have said you don’t like them as your excuse for not looking at the site I gave you.