Go back
Chemistry of first life perhaps figured out, finally:

Chemistry of first life perhaps figured out, finally:

Science

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
18 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html

C Hess

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
Clock
19 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html
Now that is exciting news. Let's see how it fares through peer-review. 🙂

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669861
Clock
23 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by C Hess
Now that is exciting news. Let's see how it fares through peer-review. 🙂
It is already published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Read the full paper here: http://www.nature.com/nchem/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nchem.2202.html

In fact the authors show how the building blocks could be made using in general one pathway. How to make a living ceel from that is a completely different challenge.
Lets see what the future will bring us in that respect.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
23 Mar 15
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html
The link says they believe "they have solved the mystery of how it was possible for life to begin on Earth" but then explains how the chemical building blocks formed known to be essential for modern life, which is not necessarily those that would be essential for the every first life to form and use. What is the justification for the assumption that the two must necessarily be one and the same thing? Why can't the very first life credibly used different chemical building blocks and only later evolved to use and depend on the chemical building blocks of modern life? I personally see no reason.

For example, the very first life might not have used either RNA nor DNA but rather just used a RNA-like substance but made of different chemical building blocks from modern RNA. I see no special reason to exclude the possibility.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
24 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

I marvel of the idea that we are all children of this very first chemical reaction...

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
26 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
I marvel of the idea that we are all children of this very first chemical reaction...
Yes, but remember, it wasn't just one reaction, there were literally trillions of reactions going on at the same time. The 'right one' probably came about a few billion times around the planet.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
26 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Yes, but remember, it wasn't just one reaction, there were literally trillions of reactions going on at the same time. The 'right one' probably came about a few billion times around the planet.
True. One of these protolives, among billions who didn't make it' changes our life to be as it is today.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.