@divegeester I want to finish the game before I kick the bucket as for why opponents resigns,ask them! I play black because I have a weakness in early defence.I HOPE THIS SATISFY YOUR CURIOSITY....
@eye-of-horus-42
Using E=Mx C squared gives the right answer as to how much energy is released if say regular mass meets with its anti matter partner.
The development of that equation is a large volume in itself and there is no way to answer that question in one paragraph.
Here is one derivation of that formula but it is not a paragraph.
https://cs.stanford.edu/people/zjl/pdf/emc2.pdf
@eye-of-horus-42
So you didn't even look at the link I provided. I SAID it was not a question that can be answered in a paragraph and that is a fact.
If it was E=MC3 the amount of energy given off by conversion either fission or fusion or matter/anti matter, the answer would be wrong and that is that and to go into the derivation will be an effort on your part. I am just an electronics and optics technician and not many scientists here.
Why is the idea MC3 or MC5 just not giving the right answer to the issue which is what the equation is all about, just how much energy do you get when you fuse or fission or matter anti matter gets together, that equation tells how much energy you get per gram or pound or ton, whatever.
@eye-of-horus-42 removed their quoted postDimensions wouldn't match left and right of the equal sign.
