Go back
Einstein equation.

Einstein equation.

Science

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I hear you, I do.


1 edit

@divegeester
My guess is he LOVES his engine but keeps it from going up to 2500 like some of these OTHER asssholes here.
I would love to play an OTB game with this dude, I am only 1700 here so he should wipe my butt in an OTB game if he really is a master with a 2200+ rating.
My 1700 for some reason is about the same as my USCF rating, mid 17's. And THAT one IS OTB.
One game that is weird how it ended, Fillippo Regni, 1890 rated player, Eye resigned when he was a pawn up and there was no coming attack that was an obvious winner for white, 2 white bishops V knight +bishop and rook V rook.
I didn't see any reason for Eye to resign. Of course I am not a 1900 player but still, I didn't see an immediate threat much less win.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester
I wish RHP had not given up monitoring the top rated games, it is now just fine to be using engines. I guess the engine users simply overwhelmed the rest of us to the point where they would have to devote 90% of their time trying to cull the cheaters leaving not much time left to fix software issues.
There are computer programs that can spot engine usage but they totally dropped out of that bit.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eye-of-horus-42
If you want to know how much energy is theoretically available from converting a mass to energy if you use anything other than Csquared, C times C, you arrive at the wrong answer.
What is wrong with that?
The whole idea is to figure out how much energy you get from converting X amount of mass to energy and E=Mass in kilograms x C squared give the correct answer.
Why would you see anything else in it?

The whole idea is to figure out how much energy you get when you convert some mass to energy.

E = Mass in Kilograms times C cubed, gives a way wrong answer, same with C to the fourth, fifth or anything else but C squared.

That is just how physics works, the E=MC squared happens to give the right amount of energy from conversion of X amount of mass.

What is your problem with that?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse I have no problem,My question was..WHY C IS SQUARE ? AND NOT JUST 'C' OR C3,OR C4 ????.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eye-of-horus-42
What the FUUK is wrong with the idea choosing some other exponent gives you the wrong answer as to how much energy there is say in one kilogram of mass totally converted to energy, how many joules do you get.
Why don't you understand that? Why are you obsessed over this in the first place?That damned equation gives the correct answer as to how much energy is available if a mass is converted, THAT IS THE POINT. Which is why that makes Einstein a genius and not you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse. Your arrogance gets you nowhere! last time I'm going to repeat. C is the speed of light, but why is square and not just C, or C 3, or C 4 etc. WHY C2 ???.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eye-of-horus-42 said
@sonhouse. Your arrogance gets you nowhere! last time I'm going to repeat. C is the speed of light, but why is square and not just C, or C 3, or C 4 etc. WHY C2 ???.
You seem to be impossible to inform. If you do any other exponent for c you get a different unit for the other side of the equation.

You could even read up on a beginners textbook for physics to get the idea how an equation works (hint: you need to have the smae unit on both sides, otherwise it is not useful for anything.

Go ahead and read the chapter on "energy". So we have different types of energy hwich can be converted in one another. They all have different units to be useful for the way we deal with them. That is why we can relate velocity and temperature for example.

After you have reached a niveau of physics of Junior High school you will be able to progress to the more demanding equations.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Ponderable
Don't worry, he is too stupid to understand anything you said.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eye-of-horus-42 said
@sonhouse. Your arrogance gets you nowhere! last time I'm going to repeat. C is the speed of light, but why is square and not just C, or C 3, or C 4 etc. WHY C2 ???.
Because it's more convenient than writing e =m*186,000mps*186,00mps.
I think you understand the equation perfectly,you just enjoy winding people up and it's working a treat

Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda
The old chain rattling trick. We answered three different ways and I think he knows good and well why it is squared and not some other number but he likes to rattle cages and see what floats to the top all the while laughing his ass off.