Originally posted by twhitehead
On balance they create jobs.
That doesn't follow from what you have said. You have simply said that unemployed people are now free to look for other work. This is not 'creating jobs' and most certainly not the thing that cause their unemployment creating jobs.
This latest j.... SNIP...lem is most people don't want to accept that they are not wo ...[text shortened]... they thought they were and thus refuse to work for less and would rather remain unemployed.
I was making a declarative statement I think you are trying to find a formal logical argument where
I wasn't making one.
I was simply stating the view I hold (one which obviously I believe stands up to scrutiny) that on net
science and technology create jobs.
If you contend that then we can discuss it further but complaining that my declarative statement (and
opinion) doesn't logically follow from what was written before it shows that you have misapprehended
my post. I think you are trying too hard to see water tight logical arguments in a post that is evidently
not written in that style.
As for the rest...
I don't agree, what you are saying doesn't tally with my experience or that of any person I have discussed
it with or other outside analysis I have seen.
I suggest that your opinion on this is wrong and unfounded and would like to see the data to back it up if
you contest this.
Because what you have written sounds like you are blaming the unemployed for being unemployed because
they are not prepared to work for less money or search around for different career options.
This couldn't be farther from the truth as I observe it.
People are desperate for work and every job has hundreds of applicants, temporary jobs at a local book-store
over Christmas go to university graduates.
And starting up a new business requires money, a loan, from the banks, who aren't lending money...
So I suggest that your opinion on the topic is total bull s***.