First love child of human, Neanderthal believed found

http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/28/17502859-first-love-child-of-human-neanderthal-believed-found?lite

Originally posted by woodypusher
http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/28/17502859-first-love-child-of-human-neanderthal-believed-found?lite

Don't believe this nonsense.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Don't believe this nonsense.

Show me some evidence that it is wrong then.

Originally posted by Kepler
Show me some evidence that it is wrong then.

I have not even seen evidence they are right. They always claim things at the drop of a hat.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have not even seen evidence they are right. They always claim things at the drop of a hat.

Yeah, I wouldn't trust people who make baseless claims.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have not even seen evidence they are right. They always claim things at the drop of a hat.

I wasn't asking whether or not you have seen any evidence that it is correct. If you know it is wrong, as you claim, you should be able to show some evidence for that.

Originally posted by woodypusher
http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/28/17502859-first-love-child-of-human-neanderthal-believed-found?lite

it wasn't love, the neanderthal wanted the sapiens sapiens' awesome cave mansion. and numerous mammoths

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
it wasn't love, the neanderthal wanted the sapiens sapiens' awesome cave mansion. and numerous mammoths

How dare you refer to our women as mammoths!

I shudder to think what they got up to! I heard that when they make documentarys on chimpanzees , about half the footage is too rude for tv.

Originally posted by Kepler
I wasn't asking whether or not you have seen any evidence that it is correct. If you know it is wrong, as you claim, you should be able to show some evidence for that.

All I am trying to do is point out that it is all speculation. I could also speculate that these Neanderthals were people that are called the Nephilim in Genesis 6:1-5. However, that does not make it true, anymore than any other speculation about the Neanderthals makes that speculation true.

Originally posted by RJHinds
All I am trying to do is point out that it is all speculation. I could also speculate that these Neanderthals were people that are called the Nephilim in Genesis 6:1-5. However, that does not make it true, anymore than any other speculation about the Neanderthals makes that speculation true.

Things based on evidence are not speculation. On that basis, your suggestion that it is wrong is speculation. The notion that neanderthals and modern humans interbred is based on evidence, controversial and somewhat flimsy evidence but still evidence.

Originally posted by Kepler
Things based on evidence are not speculation. On that basis, your suggestion that it is wrong is speculation. The notion that neanderthals and modern humans interbred is based on evidence, controversial and somewhat flimsy evidence but still evidence.

How is it that the bones of humans are evidence of Neanderthals rather than the Nephilim of Genesis 6:1-5 or any other race of people? Speculation? Certainly not fact for how do we know there was such a race of people called Neanderthals? Wasn't that just a made-up name? I think so. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Certainly not fact for how do we know there was such a race of people called Neanderthals? Wasn't that just a made-up name? I think so. 😏

How do we know there was such a race of people called Nephilim? Wasn't that just a made-up name? I think so.

Creationist claptrap has no place in the Science Forum, I seriously wish you'd stay away.